Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
"....We’re headed for extinction via nuclear meltdown
Safely shuttering a nuclear power plant requires a decade or two of careful planning. Far sooner, we’ll complete the ongoing collapse of the industrial economy. This is a source of my nuclear nightmares.
When the world’s 442 nuclear power plants melt down catastrophically, we’ve entered an extinction event. Think clusterfukushima, times 400. Ionizing radiation could, and probably will, destroy every terrestrial organism and, therefore, every marine and freshwater organism. That, by the way, includes the most unique, special, intelligent animal on Earth.
Ready for some good news?..."
I guess there are some imbeciles who would argue that because I am not providing a scenario for replacement of nuclear power, we will just have to deal with the possibility of extinction. Oh well, there is always The Afterlife.
In his January 1982 congressional testimony, the Father of America's Nuclear Navy warned about nuclear power dangers, advocating its abolition, saying:
But what did Rickover know, anyway, he was only a four-star admiral in the United States Navy who directed the original development of naval nuclear propulsion and controlled its operations for three decades as director of Naval Reactors. Rickover became the longest-serving naval officer in U.S. history with 63 years active duty. (Wikipedia, Hyman G. Rickover - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) and no way as smart as "let's be practical" guys who have numerical names. Plus everyone in Texas Knows that the Earth was only created about 2,000 years ago.
Two things, amongst a few, I found interesting in this link, where they couldn't get within 20 km of the plant before the readings were too high to continue, and Kaku's comment on the ongoing radiation after someone dies from radiation exposure..!
This was made before present readings in Tokyo and elsewhere.
And this by Helen Caldicotts shortly after the incident.
and a so called experts view challenging her views ..don't forget to see part two !
WASHINGTON — The risk that an earthquake would cause a severe accident at a U.S. nuclear plant is greater than previously thought, 24 times as high in one case, according to an AP analysis of preliminary government data.
"...Just how many nuclear power plants are more vulnerable won't be determined until all operators recalculate their own seismic risk based on new assessments by geologists, something the agency plans to request later this year..."
Don't worry, if anything happens in the meantime the plant owners won't have to pay for the consequences. Financial harm to the plant owners would be my biggest worry, don't you agree?
Fortunately, the plants are" legally owned" by asset free shell companies, and the Federal Government is liable for the damage under the Price Anderson Act (Socialism for the rich).