Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I'm re-opening this thread from a few years ago since it's a question I was about to post in a new thread before I found this one.
Since this thread was started, Bookmap has come on the market and heavily marketed of their use of MBO and the way they present it. I tried Bookmap a while back for a few months and while it was interesting, it never resonated with me. Perhaps that is my fault.
Question 1: To re-state the OP's original question: Are there other platforms or add-ons to existing platforms (i.e. Ninja or MultiCharts), that effectively use and present MBO information in a way that's useful to retail traders?
Question 2: One of the questions I had back when I tried Bookmap was that the big players's algos can submit their orders in rapid fashion so that even MBO will show see the book behind them as it is never presented to the exchange. Does that reduce the effectiveness of MBO data? It seems to me that it would but I'm sure there are folks that know a lot more than I do about the topic.
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals, U308 and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,083 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,429
Thanks Received: 10,274
Can confirm
Trading Technologies is MBP
Stellar Trading Systems is MBO
As to the OP question I believe that nothing has changed and the only difference between MBP and MBO is that one is limited to 10 layers of depth and the other isn't. So is more than 10 layers of depth informative?
On a slight tangent, right now, trading prompt month Natural Gas, if you have a DOM open that it is 30 ticks wide, you probably only see 4 depths of the order book its that thin!
Exchanges have rather strict messaging policies ( see CME's here and ICE's here ) which don't kick in until you hit 20,000 messages on CME or 100,000 messages on ICE. Both policies score orders, CME based upon what type of order it is and ICE based upon how close to the inside market the order is. Either way flashing lots of orders off market will kill your messaging ratio and unless you are trading massive volume, will subject you to a lot of fines. Software like TT and Stellar (and I assume other top pro or in house software) have functionality to prevent this. In TT it's called 'inside smart quote' and in Stellar its "sensitivity". In its simplest form it says "If this order is more than X ticks away from market stop updating it until it is back within X ticks again". So while I'm not saying people don't intentionally show or even flash orders in the depth of the order book (obviously that's exactly what spoofing is/was), I am saying that many/most people actually go to great efforts to reduce their messaging in the depths of the order book.
Any idea if those MBO providers also provide historical data? This is for academic research. CME does offer historical, but the free tier for academia is not extended for MBO or BBO (top of the book).
Cheers!
I use IQFeed and I am sure they provide the said data in realTime only. I once talked to dxFeed and they said they dont provide historical MBO data "because its a lot of data" - this is most likely indication that they have the historical data (while IQFeed doesnt store this kind of data I would say, so they dont even have the history of MBO) so maybe it makes sense to drop dxfeed an email.
Actually contacted them along with a myriad other providers and they don't have free samples for students. CME usually does, but for some reason the BBO and MBO aren't part of the package offered to universities.
Can you tell me a bit about what type of research topic you're interested in? Something "academic" such as long memory in order durations (made that topic up), or something closer to trading?
Also what type of data are you after (stocks, futures, options .. )?
Funny ... I just recalled that back in the day (some 14 years ago) I wrote a piece of software for a research agency to allow for fast order book retrieval from historical CME stock data. So in essence, I should have a couple of DVDs somewhere with CME MBO stock data ... but I guess you want newer than from 2008, right?
I was interested in index futures as it combines all types of trades (speculation, hedging, etc..) particularly the most liquid ES.
It was to do some tests based on pattern execution and time horizon category identification.
You're right, I'd prefer post 2008, as the numbers liquidity and patterns changed. Although, would be interesting to compare and contrast pre and post recession environments. The data is so huge, I don't even attempt to request more than 2-3 months. Bogs down any computer/server in my lab and slows down the research. Mind you, nothing has been slower than finding the historical data. I even concluded to finding top of the book data, as that may suffice. However, even that is difficult to source for free.
If you hear someone with level 2 data for ES or some such, please update this tread if you don't mind, I'll keep an eye.
Wow the post you quoted was from 4 years ago. How time flies.
I've since then brought the idea and some of my projects that I described in this thread to a startup (Databento), where I've been consulting as one of the lead developers, and we've nearly formalized it into a commercial data feed.