Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Rule 575. Disruptive Practices Prohibited
All orders must be entered for the purpose of executing bona fide transactions. Additionally,
all non-actionable messages must be entered in good faith for legitimate purposes.
A. No person shall enter or cause to be entered an order with the intent, at the time of order
entry, to cancel the order before execution or to modify the order to avoid execution;
B. No Person shall enter or cause to be entered an actionable or non-actionable message
or messages with intent to mislead other market participants;
C. No Person shall enter or cause to be entered an actionable or non-actionable message
or messages with intent to overload, delay, or disrupt the systems of the Exchange or
other market participants; and
D. No person shall enter or cause to be entered an actionable or non-actionable message
with intent to disrupt, or with reckless disregard for the adverse impact on, the orderly
conduct of trading or the fair execution of transactions.
To the extent applicable, the provisions of this Rule apply to open outcry trading as well as
electronic trading activity. Further, the provisions of this Rule apply to all market states,
including the pre-opening period, the closing period and all trading sessions.
Flooding the channel with bid ask changes well beyond the current last, or other changes that consume bandwidth and cause latency, giving advantages to those who are doing it.
seems like political pressure has won it and now created a rule/law which is totally left up to interpretation by an agency that has been proven to be maybe not so.
My 2 cents