Any reason to use PH's GO instead of NT's if not using enums

February 8th, 2012, 04:13 PM

I've been running some optimization using the built-in GO from NT and the results are....questionable. I'm wondering if there are any advantages to using PH and MeGo's optimizers if I'm not using enums? Are they faster, better? Or should I just greatly increase my generations and the default GO will be good enough?

Thanks,

February 8th, 2012, 04:16 PM

piersh's GO was only for NT 6.5. It is not compatible with NT7.

Here is the main thread:

NinjaTrader Genetic Optimizer

Latest version (1.12), with NT7 support, is here (

Hi All,

I've created a new Genetic Strategy Optimizer based loosely on Peter's GAOptimizer.

Installation Instructions:
- download the .ZIP file from the download link (above). NOTE: ignore …

And MoGo:

MoGo Genetic Optimizer for NT7

Many folks like the MoGo optimizer better than PH Genetic. It certainly has more features. I personally use the PH Genetic but decided to port the MoGo to 7 as an exercise to deepen my knowledge of programming. Attached is the NT7 version. It is completely …

I am closing this duplicate thread.

Mike

Any reason to use PH's GO instead of NT's if not using enums

Discussion in NinjaTrader

Any reason to use PH's GO instead of NT's if not using enums