Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 200,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- discounts are available after registering.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
hi
choose 100 volume 6E in NT, MC and SC
compare charts and tell me what you think and which the program correctly displays the price action?
HM HM
THANKS
* If investing gets too difficult for a seventh grader to understand, the system is needlessly complex
* Markets produce an enormous volume of information, much of which is redundant
* In every game and con there's always an opponent, and there's always a victim. The trick is to know when you're the latter, so you can become the former
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
"Which the program correctly displays the price action?" This can be specific to the feed and charting software you choose, your three charts may be individually "perfect" and charted exactly as each program is defined. Those individual software program restraints or features should be serious considerations when choosing software to fulfill a traders specific needs.
I'll assume you're using the exact same data supplier for these three charts. I'll further assume your data feed is providing you with the actual volume of contracts traded on each trade. If the above is true there are three other considerations you may need to address.
1.) Verify the time stamp of all three charts are synchronized within 1 centisecond (1/100 of a second).
2.) Verify each of the three charting programs are processing the data and building Volume Charts the same way. Some programs "cap" volume bars. For instance say you're building vol bars of 100, within the current bar the volume is at 90 contracts, the NEXT TICK is a 20 contract trade, SOME programs will INCLUDE the EXTRA 10 contracts within that bar, another program will "cap" the volume of that bar at 100 and begin building THE NEXT BAR with the remaining 10 contracts.
3.) Lastly verify the latency of the charting software, not the data feed. Some programs are just plain faster than others when processing the incoming data and displaying/charting it, this often shows up during high volume periods/moves in the market.
I performed advanced degaussian analysis and bifurcated the results using a simple quantum algorithm that couples the mean to a lower state and then filtered them using my own proprietary method (loosely based on the heidelklum theory) and found that the Sierra Chart chart has the highest correlation (99.8675309, to be precise) to the ideal Kepler/Chezberger Wave. Is that what you found?
ok, i use same data feed (zenfire) on these platforms
Do not pay attention to the volume indicator for ninja
you notice that in all three charts there is a difference in the number bars, length and closure
analyze price action and you will understand what I'm asking, ok!?
* If investing gets too difficult for a seventh grader to understand, the system is needlessly complex
* Markets produce an enormous volume of information, much of which is redundant
* In every game and con there's always an opponent, and there's always a victim. The trick is to know when you're the latter, so you can become the former
