Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Yes, the COT report should be taken into consideration when trading a spread. 30 years ago the COT report didn't exist, the market would make an educated guess re composition of open interest. Now it is all there, neatly compiled for the market to see, It might be added that the COT works to the detriment of the speculative content of the market, e.g. funds. Anyways, it is one tool that should be taken into consideration with other influences. The markets have learned to anticipate how and when funds will manage their positions e.g. Goldman Roll. Saying that, a large spec long doesn't guarantee that a spread will move towards carry. There have been contracts squeezed by funds, most recently oats (which was predictable). From personal experience, 20 years ago i often held significant long spec positions prior to first delivery day, but I wouldn't replicate those trades now simply because of the COT report.
The problem with the Commitment of Trader reports are their accuracy. Back in 2008 the CFTC reclassified Vitol from being a commercial hedger to non-commerical speculator. The result? An 10% shift in the report. Yes reclassifying one company resulted …
IMHO, if you have a good price-based model with confirmation, it will pick up on seasonal spread moves. You won't absolutely "time" a bottom or top - but nobody can do that anyway.
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,057 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,399
Thanks Received: 10,225
Just curious what you mean by this? I think of seasonal trades as having a (very?) significant 'time based' component which a pure price based model doesn't have.
The bean spread that is going to get interesting over the next month is the N/X. funds long 130k N, half the open interest. I think they are going to take delivery of zero. Could get ugly if they roll.
not really. i was never a spread trader pre se, except that i would trade bond calendar spreads in the pit, mainly because it was there and the transactions costs weren't; and and i could get the edge. in other words, i could put on a lot …
My personal opinion is that terms like "seasonals" and " mean reversion" are descriptive terms or definitions that do not necessarily have to be a unique trading style or strategy. Most believe it has to be that way, but I am not.
A price based model that uses a well designed technical entry signal and relies upon historical trading ranges to set profit targets and stop-loss levels will pick up on "seasonal" moves in commodities like grains, energy, and softs just fine speaking from personal experience. Just my 2 cents.