Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Well then ... isn't this "horse has left the barn" situation.
I don't hand over money to anyone (never on the net besides of course places like Amazon) without knowing their full story. Protection starts, and most times end, with self.
If I ask a vendor for a performance report or proof that their system works I usually get "the regulators won't let me divulge that" as a reply. I'm just trying to find out what regulators.
I don't get an answer when I ask that question. I was hoping that someone on this forum might know and be able to point to the regulation.
"The days when I keep my gratitude higher than my expectations, I have really good days" RW Hubbard
I don't have much experience in this, I generally go by the rule of fraud until proven otherwise.
But I really don't think there is any regulation/regulator anywhere (not just US) that prevents any vendor from disclosing his proof of system being profitable. In fact they should be liable to provide you with whatever you are asking since they are selling service based on it. I would be really really surprised if there is anything that hinders it.
This is probably some excuse to dodge your question I think.