Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I voted for 'Laurel' as that's what I could first hear. But then I was spooked when I listened to it again a while later. I thought I must have been listening to a different version as I could hear 'Yanni'.
If I start the video first by expecting to hear Yanni, that's what I'll hear, but by the end I can get it morphed in my head to Laurel.
I find this fascinating because of the relationship with many things in life, including trading. Sometimes we are all so sure that our sensory perception is right we don't even question how the same external stimulus could be seen, heard or interpreted by someone else.
I also had a temptation to run the sound file through different sound output devices. I normally route my PC sound through my stereo system. I thought I might unplug the stereo and plug some headphones into the sound jack:
1. With an OK but not great Logitech PC-type headset, I got something kind of like "Yally" or "Yowlly" -- I would vote that as a "Yanny," but not that clearly so.
2. With an extremely good pair of Sennheiser earphones, it was clearly and undoubtedly "Laurel" every time. (Made me think I need to either upgrade my stereo speakers or fiddle with the equalizer settings )
I think frequency response is what makes the difference.
--------------------
Here are some things I found on the internet on the subject. Your own ears' frequency response is mentioned frequently as a factor, as well as purely psychological factors like your prior expectations. After my headphone test, I am inclined to think it is all about frequency response, your own or your equipment's (or both.)
They do show how adding additional frequencies to the voice recording can switch the perceived sound from Laurel to Yanny. Also how shifting the pitch up or down can change what you hear.
I hear a deep man's voice saying "Laurel" in my good headphones, which I think have a better full-frequency range; in this case, it would include better bass.)
Check these out:
Part way through this video, they show how shifting the pitch can make you hear Yanny or Laurel. (At least, it did for me. Who knows about anyone else? Which I think is a point you can get from all this....)
This vidwo also has suggestions about initial expectations (which I don't fine too convincing) and frequencies your ears can hear and/or your sound system/speakers/headphones can play.
Supposedly, "Laurel" is what was originally recorded, with some higher frequencies added to mess with us.
In fact, the intriguing thing for me is that when I am able to distinguish both, 'Laurel' is clearly pronounced by a man with a deep voice, while 'Yanni' is being pronounced by someone with a not-so-deep voice.
As you said, it's a combination of factors, environmental-based and also bias-based.
There's also another YT video where they slow the audio file down incrementally and then speed it up and invariably you can hear both names.
Another couple of similar ones
and
In the last one, if you focus on the woman on the left they all turn clockwise, but if you focus on the one on the right they all turn anticlockwise.
I think you should add a third option: "Both" or "It depends" -- at this point I don't know which of the two I should click on, and it doesn't allow both.
When you cut the treble it tends to lean more to Laurel, but when you cut the bass it tends to lean more towards Yanny.
So depending on the speakers....
In the analytical world there is no such thing as art, there is only the science you know and the science you don't know. Characterizing the science you don't know as "art" is a fools game.