Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 200,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- discounts are available after registering.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
One would have thought with all the rampant rug pulls and scams in CFD prop, regulators would have come down hard already. But they didn’t. Other then pressuring the platform with the largest market share, to put on restrictions who could use it, not much has really changed.
The biggest scammers are still in or coming back into the game.
Legendary and occasionally successful index futures day trader
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Tradovate / Webull
Broker: Tradovate
Trading: Futures / 0dte SPY
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 518 since May 2023
Thanks Given: 213
Thanks Received: 365
Best I could find was that CFDs were banned back in 2000 by the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000 (OTC swaps no longer allowed), so seems like we would need another type of US congressional act to prevent or change these companies work
It was but there were FX Prop Firms popping up in recent years. Once MyForexFunds got halted by CFTC, they all scattered offshore or disappeared altogether.
The assertion was since they were using “demo” CFD feeds they should be ok.
It wasn’t so much the CFD thing that imploded them rather the fear of regulator crackdown and severe platform restrictions caused massive loss of revenue. Payouts got longer/denied, firms folded overnight, etc.
Trust was lost so they all migrated to the next best thing, which was futures prop and Apex’s low barrier to enter.
So this means, if I strictly follow all of my rules and when it comes to payout, they are paying from their profits instead of my earnings from my (supposedly) live account despite me trading in simulation?
Legendary and occasionally successful index futures day trader
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Tradovate / Webull
Broker: Tradovate
Trading: Futures / 0dte SPY
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Minutes
Posts: 518 since May 2023
Thanks Given: 213
Thanks Received: 365
No.
The simulation in this reference is that your trades are in a simulation environment, no real money is being deposited into the company, and no real money or margin is used to place trades. If you are funded with Apex, I'd suggest you reread their contract (found this link to copy of contact btw from twitter @Big Mikehttps://pastebin.com/Wqbz2pkG) and you'll see that they define "Live trades" as any "trades placed, including open positions, by the Trader. [...] Company will open each account, the minimum balance as set forth above, initially of synthetic SIM currency. Synthetic accounts do not contain genuine or legal tender, but shall still be available for payout as defined in this agreement"
If you were trading in a "real live account" with Apex or any other funding program company, you would know without a doubt. I have yet to meet someone that is actually trading live in apex, but I do know a few trading live in other online prop firm funding programs. I'm missing where the notion that you were trading live is coming from though.
You get paid when you follow the company rules because you aren't really trading, but doing using "evaluation and rewards service" (the language they use in the funding contracts).
Where the money comes from is unknown, but could be from a mix and match of: new user fees, user reset fees, outside investors, profit share from real "live" traders in their system, your trades being copied to a live market in their own account, them trading independently in their own account but using your trading history as advantaged market information, or selling your simulation order flow to a third party so they can use it as advantaged market information. With the general consensus in this threat being that Apex is getting the vast majority of is money for payouts from new account fees / funding activation fees / blown account reset fees
I lost 3 PA- and 2 eval-accounts because of not executed orders and ghostorders, which you couldn't close. And this after the mass with Rithmic were announced to be solved. "Clear your cache and blablabla" were the answer. So I quit Apex. As an ex-customer, you can't open an account anymore now, while they still take new customers. "They are unable to discuss any details further" Ok, Apex. I've bought popcorn already and will enjoy the show....
I've been through the Evaluation -> Performance Account -> Live account process with Apex. It was very clear to me at all times that I was trading sim from evaluation to PA. When I went to a "true" Live account, I had to sign new documents (with broker, not Apex), etc., and it was very clear that it was a live environment (you can see your orders hit T&S if trading in low volume). It's a completely different experience than trading a PA account, from contract to account setup, to even the support you get--you get support you'd expect when you're trading a live brokerage account (support isn't through Apex, it's through the broker).
If you care to share, what has been your experience in results/executions between the sim accounts and the real accounts?
Did you find it easier to profit in the sim accounts as compared to the real account?
I frequently see people crushing it in SIM but struggling with real accounts, curious if you have that experience. If you do see difference, why do you think there is a difference?