Dark Theme
Light Theme
Trading Articles
Article Categories
Article Tools
Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to
register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.
It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Updated December 22, 2023
Top Posters
looks_one
SMCJB
with 103 posts (168 thanks)
looks_two
WoodyFox
with 46 posts (54 thanks)
looks_3
tturner86
with 37 posts (57 thanks)
looks_4
Grodon
with 28 posts (5 thanks)
Best Posters
looks_one
bobwest
with 3.5 thanks per post
looks_two
Pariah Carey
with 3.5 thanks per post
looks_3
Big Mike
with 2.9 thanks per post
looks_4
SMCJB
with 1.6 thanks per post
trending_up
157,487 views
thumb_up
857 thanks given
group
51 followers
forum
558 posts
attach_file
34 attachments
December 8th, 2015, 04:38 PM
Portland, Oregon
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: F-16CM-40
Trading: GBU-39
Posts: 6,189 since Sep 2013
Thanks Given: 10,459
Thanks Received: 12,695
Quoting
According to American Police Beat, the average response time for an emergency call is 10 minutes. Atlanta has the worst response time with 11 to 12 minutes and Nashville comes in at a lightning speed of 9 minutes.
10 mins in any active shooter situation or any criminal situation is a long time to wait for your defense to show up. Police on average do not stop crimes. They respond and investigate crimes once they are over.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
Best Threads (Most Thanked) in the last 7 days on NexusFi
December 8th, 2015, 04:46 PM
Portland, Oregon
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: F-16CM-40
Trading: GBU-39
Posts: 6,189 since Sep 2013
Thanks Given: 10,459
Thanks Received: 12,695
Quoting
"To what extent do police prevent crime?
If police begin chasing immediately after a crime has been done, and chase very fast, criminals may think twice about doing crime to begin with, which puts our well-being at the moral discretion of criminals."
You ask an interesting question, and the hypothetical conclusion you suggest may have merit. The answer to this question depends upon several factors:
How do we define "police"? Are we limiting our discussion to armed, uniformed men employed by the state? What about unarmed people employed by the state? What about armed men hired privately? In a very rural or sparsely-populated area, would we consider random, voluntary "protectors" within the community "police"?
Does your question refer to mere police presence, actual police activity, or both?
Do the police actually "begin chasing immediately after a crime has been done", as you suggest? If so, can we actually measure the result you suggest and can we causally link that result to police (and not some other cause)? If not, what do the police actually do? Would some other mechanism (for instance, everyone and anyone) produce the same or better result?
One corollary consideration, and one I believe is just as important as your question, is (supposing that police actually do prevent crime) do the benefits outweigh the costs? Would it be worthwhile to spend $5 per month to prevent the theft of a $500 stereo? Would it be worthwhile to spend $100 per month? What if it wasn't a stereo, but a life?
To answer your question (lol) one way is to examine the "Kansas City preventive patrol experiment" (@Kansas City preventive patrol experiment). Take a look at it for yourself, research it, and come to your own conclusion.
In an article by the Police Foundation (the authors of the study itself), the author observes:
"Patrol is considered the backbone of police work. Billions of dollars are spent each year in the United States to maintain and operate uniformed and often superbly equipped patrol forces. The assumption underlying such deployment has been that the presence or potential presence of officers patrolling the streets in marked police
cars deters people from committing crime.
But the validity of this assumption had never been scientifically tested. And so, in 1972, with funding and technical assistance from the Police Foundation, the Kansas City Police launched a comprehensive, scientifically rigorous experiment to test the effects of police patrol on crime."
What they found, in a nutshell, was that police presence had essentially zero impact on crime. From the Police Foundation:
"Interestingly, citizens did not notice the difference when the level of patrol was changed. What is more, increasing or decreasing the level of police patrol had no significant effect on resident and commercial burglaries, auto thefts, larcenies involving auto accessories, robberies, or vandalism–crimes traditionally considered to be prevented by random, highly visible police patrol.
The rate at which crimes were reported to the police did not differ in any important or consistent way across the experimental beats. Citizen fear of crime was not affected by different levels of patrol. Nor was citizen satisfaction with police.
"Ride-alongs" by observers during the experiment also revealed that 60 percent of the time spent by a Kansas City patrol officer typically was noncommitted. In other words, officers spent a considerable amount of time waiting to respond to calls for service. And they spent about as much time on non-police related activities as they did on police-related mobile patrol."
One reaction to these findings is found in the advent of what's been termed "proactive policing". The Canadian Department of Justice states, "One American study found that proactive policing resulted in more arrests, detention and filing of reports than reactive policing (Seagrave, 1997)"; that full article can be found here: @6.0 Policing styles: Reactive versus proactive policing. What's left out of the Canadian Department of Justice's otherwise very comprehensive article is whether these arrests, detentions, and reports reduced crime.
It would appear that these activities while "doing something", and costing money in the form of, well, arrests, detentions, and reports, do nothing to make a community any safer or reduce crime. So what does reduce crime?
Time and time again, across study after study, the answer is the same: decentralized, distributed, real-time response to crime is the only truly effective solution. In other words: stopping crime depends upon YOU stepping in and doing it yourself. Call the police, yes: call them to come investigate, verify, and document that you did not criminally assault, batter, or kill the criminal you've already defended yourself from!
The very idea that calling some "special" person to your aid from somewhere far away, necessitating his driving at nearly (or sometimes actually) reckless speeds, forcing traffic off the road, to save you from a threat that you and those in your immediate presence could just as easily defend yourselves from with only a modicum of training is insane. Having "police" everywhere and nowhere within a community, leaving criminals without the means to determine just who will use force to stop him is a real deterrent to crime.
@Detroit police chief: "There's no question" that armed citizens are helping to reduce crime in our city
https://www.quora.com/To-what-extent-do-police-prevent-crime
Detroit police chief: ?There?s no question? that armed citizens are helping to reduce crime in our city « Hot Air
6.0*Policing styles: Reactive versus proactive policing - IV.*Organizational Factors Affecting Police Discretion - Police Discretion with Young Offenders
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kansas_City_preventive_patrol_experiment
December 8th, 2015, 05:43 PM
Memphis TN
Legendary E-mini dictator for life
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Thinkorswim
Broker: TDAmeritrade
Trading: Futures
Posts: 1,056 since Jan 2014
Thanks Given: 158
Thanks Received: 3,683
SMCJB
I think 10 examples going back 18 years sort of proves my point.
It virtually never happens. It actually happens once every 22 months.
Most events for which we have insurance to protect us against don't happen that often either. Like finding yourself the victim of a violent crime. But it's good to have the insurance (in this case a gun).
December 8th, 2015, 06:10 PM
Houston TX
Legendary Market Wizard
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TT Stellar & Tradestation
Broker: Primarily Advantage Futures
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals, U308 and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,059 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,410
Thanks Received: 10,226
@tturner86 I don't think anybody was making a debate about the police, my debate is am I safer if your allowed to buy a gun, and my belief is no because your gun is more likely to be used to harm me than to protect me. I understand you feel safer with it, but again that's not my argument.
@Pariah Carey You buying insurance doesn't effect me but you buying and/or carrying a gun can do. Hence I think that's a inappropriate analogy.
The problem is your right's to buy and carry a gun have got to the point that it outweighs my right to be safe.
December 8th, 2015, 06:16 PM
Houston TX
Legendary Market Wizard
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TT Stellar & Tradestation
Broker: Primarily Advantage Futures
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals, U308 and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,059 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,410
Thanks Received: 10,226
By the way I'd like to say I am enjoying this conversation, and hope that you feel the same.
December 8th, 2015, 06:40 PM
Portland, Oregon
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: F-16CM-40
Trading: GBU-39
Posts: 6,189 since Sep 2013
Thanks Given: 10,459
Thanks Received: 12,695
SMCJB
By the way I'd like to say I am enjoying this conversation, and hope that you feel the same.
I do. I took speech and debate in high school. Lively discourse and debate is the only way ideas are advanced.
December 8th, 2015, 06:42 PM
Portland, Oregon
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: F-16CM-40
Trading: GBU-39
Posts: 6,189 since Sep 2013
Thanks Given: 10,459
Thanks Received: 12,695
SMCJB
@
tturner86 I don't think anybody was making a debate about the police, my debate is am I safer if your allowed to buy a gun, and my belief is no because your gun is more likely to be used to harm me than to protect me. I understand you feel safer with it, but again that's not my argument.
@
Pariah Carey You buying insurance doesn't effect me but you buying and/or carrying a gun can do. Hence I think that's a inappropriate analogy.
The problem is your right's to buy and carry a gun have got to the point that it outweighs my right to be safe.
The problem is precedent and gradualism. If you are willing to trade one right for another you will eventually end up with neither.
December 8th, 2015, 10:57 PM
Houston TX
Legendary Market Wizard
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TT Stellar & Tradestation
Broker: Primarily Advantage Futures
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals, U308 and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,059 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,410
Thanks Received: 10,226
marin
A pro-gun news article that uses an abortion chart to illustrate how charts can be misleading. Hmmmm..... maybe not surprising they are a Right Wing Think Tank.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics."
For what its worth his explanation of 2-axis charts is BS (not debating the subject matter itself). The two-charts he shows a) illustrate two completely different data points , b) are more representative of the 1st S&P chart that he says is wrong than the 2nd one that he says is right and c) are highly dependent upon the chosen 'start date' (probably intentionally).
A good statistician can make number show anything they want...
His chart...
Different Axis... Different Picture
Or even how about this....
Different Start Point... Different Scales ... Different Picture.
By the way what exactly does a Right/Left wing Think Tank actually mean? ... how can you be a think tank but be biased one way or another... Right/Left wing propganda generators would be more accurate.
December 9th, 2015, 04:26 AM
Portland, Oregon
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: F-16CM-40
Trading: GBU-39
Posts: 6,189 since Sep 2013
Thanks Given: 10,459
Thanks Received: 12,695
Last Updated on December 21, 2023