Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
You are absolutely right - standard deviation of trades is a super important metric. A small standard deviation makes things so much easier, and really helps in position sizing.
I don't know how Van developed his guidelines for avg/std dev, but the concept (lower std deviations are better) is sound.
I would have no qualms trading this system live if it got close to its average line. I'd accept the variability, and all its other flaws, but it first has to get closer to (or ideally above) the average line.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
Although I'm not planning to change my approach or trading at this point, I'm curious what people in the community think.
If you were me right now, knowing all the Combine and backtest info I have posted thus far, what would you do?
A. I'd start trading differently. This strategy is clearly not working.
B. I'd stay the course - keep trading as you are. Don't deviate from the plan
C. I'd just give up right now. No sense prolonging the inevitable failure to pass the Combine.
D. I'd for broke with one last big trade, and if that trade wins, I'd do the minimum necessary to pass the Combine.
E. I'd try to get to slightly positive, and hope to rollover the Combine. I would then trade it with a better strategy, or the same strategy.
F. Something else - another option not listed
There is no right or wrong answer. I just want to gauge how others would react at this point. Feel free to answer with just a letter, or with a detailed explanation.
Personally with so few trades I think it is not possible to make an informed conclusion just yet, unless there was a result that is wildly outside the initial parameters, which does not seem to be the case.
Hey guys, I am new to BigMikes, just curious but has anybody on the site passed the TST combine? I'm not asking because I doubt the combine whatsoever, I am just curious if anyone has managed on here.
Sorry to ask questions on your thread! Good luck with the combine!
In general terms (and not to be taken personally by anybody):
A - Changing horses midstream - generates more uncertainty than it addresses.
C - Speaks about a self-defeatist attitude, lack of faith.
D - Speaks of immaturity and the loss of self-restraint that deviates from professionalism at the most inopportune moment.
E - Speaks of the common sense practicality which is what we use to get though an imperfect world. However if I do B then E will be atleast possible. If I aim for E it will might be the equivalent of reducing one's targets and that is also a change in strategy!
UUUUUUGGGGGHHHHH! Waiting for the Big One, and almost had it today...
Like every other trader out there, occasionally I come across situations where my entry is almost hit, but isn't. Of course, then the market takes off without me. VERY frustrating. Today was such a day.
Missing an entry by a couple of ticks can be psychologically devastating. It makes you think "my system is good - it just needs a little adjustment," or maybe "the logic is sound, maybe I need to add more rules to my plan" or worse yet "how could my system miss such a great trade? I'm ditching it!" Your mind will think of a million ways to make that "nearly a trade" into "definitely a trade." In the end, your brain might actually think that trade WAS in your strategy - you just missed benefiting from it.
"IF that trade had been made, I'd be in good shape for passing the Combine."
Of course, such thinking is dangerous. Just look at the facts - your strategy did not have that trade. Your backtest would not have had that trade. That "trade" wasn't a trade for you. It is nothing to you.
If you change your strategy to include that trade (maybe by entering a few ticks early, as price approaches your entry price), are you going to review your history, and include all other cases just like this? Maybe then your strategy will actually be worse - who knows?
This situation seems to happen to me a lot when I trade with discretion. With automated systems, though, I don't notice it nearly as much. It still happens, I am sure, but since orders and calculations are being done behind the scenes, it is not as apparent to me.
With the Combine strategy, though, I do see these near misses, since I manually enter each order. Today's "almost" trade was a whopper. I missed a great trade by 2 or 3 ticks. I had a limit order to sell short at 1.3100. The high was 1.3098. So, I was 2, probably 3, ticks away from a fill. As I write this, it would have been a $1,000 winner. $&%^#*@# !!!!!!!!
On one hand, this makes me feel really good about the system - it was oh-so-close to getting a great trade. On the other hand, this fills me with disappointment. Not many whopper trades are out there, and my system just missed a great one.
Really, I should feel neither happiness, nor disappointment. I should feel NOTHING, because nothing happened.
The lesson here is DON'T PLAY THE "IF" GAME. As someone once said, "if 'ifs' were fifths, we'd all be drunk!"