Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
The margin required for an overnight contract is usually fixed as recommended by CME but day trading margins differ with each broker, as you would know.
The brokers who follow the CME margins for outrights and spreads are, to my knowledge, IB, advantage futures, vision financial.
Other brokers like AMP, Mirus, velocity etc have very less day trading margins for most outright but till now they were not offering spreads and relevent margins.
I have a live account with AMP and AMP has recently offered x-trader for trading on transactional basis and that includes spreads on CME, Eurex and ICE....I guess other brokers would also follow. I have confirmed with AMP that they recognise margin credit for a spread trade and can be held overnight at the margin recommended by CME.
In your example, we have following contracts on 6S with dec and march volumes in the pic.
6S outright contract requires > $2000 as margin however the calender spread requires just $130 for holding it overnight.
Check the pics in attachments.
So its best to inquire with the broker about margins but now x-trader available on transactional basis with spread margins would be a great offer.
1. The distant contract will likely have a wider spread. Right now, for example, the March 6S spread is double the Dec 6S spread. And now is probably a good time, since many people are rolling from Dec to Mar. So, count on extra spread costs.
2. These instruments do not always move in tandem, and can actually move opposite each other. This is not so bad with currencies, but with ags it is a big deal. You can probably count on losing a bit here.
The bottom line is that in the long run it is much cheaper, and much more efficient, to combine all strategies in one account, and just trade the net position. The drawback is figuring out the logic. I know it can be done, though - I have done on a small scale (<5 systems). And, I know of one CTA who combines 20 systems, and a hedge funs that combines 30 systems, all into one master account.
I appreciate the great info. Its inspired me to start working out how I can use that method myself.
I completely understand the concept of just trading the net position but since this is not the way I have been trading I was wondering if you could give a relatively simple real-life (not necessarily a real position you are in) example of how the master account would behave when trading just two or three positions at once. It might help me break my brain lock that is preventing me from getting to a starting point on envisioning how this process works specific to my needs.
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals, U308 and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,058 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,409
Thanks Received: 10,226
I must correct myself. :-( - a rare occurrence!
I just talked to the operations group at my broker and while I was correct that they allow Master Accounts with sub-accounts they strongly discourage/disallow you trading the same products in different sub-accounts.
Hence what I proposed is apparently not an option.
To exit, you could do the same if you used market orders
If strategy1=Long and should exit then GoLong=GoLong-1
If strategy2=Long and should exit then GoLong=GoLong-1
If strategy3=Long and should exit then GoLong=GoLong-1
Then GoLong will tell you how many contracts you should still be long.
You can get really involved with limit and stop orders, but that is just a basic example.
The logic takes a while to get correct, but the benefitrs are worth it in the end.
If you are saying that at certain times your individual strategies could be in opposite directions, then your best approach would be to use the "sub" account approach and monitor each independently.
If you are long and short because it is easier for you "emotionally / psychologically" than just being Flat, you probably should reevaluate your trading methodology. Being Long and Short the same market in the same month is the same thing as being out, except that instead of having no positions to manage, you have two to manage (and mess up).
I agree with @Jvvv, if you are long 1 and short 1 of the same instrument / same month, then technically you are flat, whether you are using one account or two. I used to spread trade so I appreciate the nuances of being long one instrument and short another, but the same instrument? I can't understand how this can provide any opportunity or risk at all? Eventually, to profit, you will have to close one of the positions which is the same as putting the opposite position on.... so why not just do that? I don't intend to be negative here just confused because everything I've learned about trading tells me this doesn't make sense. Can you site an example of how you can profit from this strategy?
It only makes sense from a bookkeeping sense. It will cost you more commission, extra slippage, and carrying costs. Even after all this, some people think it is still worthwhile.
Only one situation I know does it make sense, and it is with stocks.
Let's say there is upcoming announcement, and you want to be short. But you know if you wait until near the announcement, no stock will be available to short. So, today you buy the stock, and also short it. Then, when the announcement comes, you simply sell your long stock, leaving you net short.
Ah cool, as a means of establishing a position in an illiquid market! Thanks, that makes sense, I hadn't thought of that. I really appreciate you taking my question as it was intended, I honestly could not think of a scenario but this maker total sense.