Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 200,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- discounts are available after registering.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Signal entry is based of the ask and exits are based off the bid. I'm not terribly concerned about replacing them with limit orders due to the strategy analyzing the bid/ask. I would rather the contracts be filled even if there is a chance of slippage. I also analyze the bid/ask separation and if a contract has a wide spread I totally ignore it. I think the $14 round trip commissions is rather wide as it is for what may happen with slippage. Slippage works both ways from my experience, giving someone either better or worse fills... we only speak about it when it is adversely effecting our strategies.. and seem to ignore the latter.
Having baked in high commissions it makes it harder to be profitable.. But if I can show profit with triple the commission costs in sim mode then I think it is realistic that it would be profitable live. Just my .2 cents of thinking, especially with only trading one contract. If i was looking to trade larger orders then this would not work as expected.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
