Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I'm definitely not saying that AMP is doing it. I'm just saying that big names in the past who everybody thought they were honest guys were not so honest if you look at the NFA website.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
I don't think it was intentional. Its a new API, and your being their beta tester. AMP still has alot of issues IMO. If their own brokers don't know what they're offering, thats not good. There's already a thread about amp and CQG, you should have posted over there, that way they can help solve your problems. I also suggest you check your brokerage statement to make sure the trades match to what ninja is reporting.
I could be wrong, but I don't think there's a case of a futures broker doing that. Perhaps you're thinking of some of the forex firms that have been caught doing stuff like that, but that's a whole different ballgame.
Perhaps you should open a new thread about brokers being fined? Since you insist that your comments have nothing to do with AMP, I am not sure other brokers being fined is very relevant to this thread which is about slippage experienced with AMP.