Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
That's what we will mastermind here if anyone here see some potential of course but 99.9% of member of this forum already think it's gone sink like the Titanic so I won't expect a lot of help here. It will be more done backstage by PMs and emails.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
Several here have tried to highlight the massive difference between theoretical backtests, which can show promising (even spectacular) returns, and actual forward testing/live experience, even on sound systems. In addition we have also highlighted the many similar attempts to use just this sort of indicator setup with special bars, where the results will usually be more misleading than average.
You should also take note to consider the fact that (as far as you have indicated) Tim only offered backtest results for his system - without significant forward testing at minimum and live running evidence in multiple market conditions he may not have had as profitable a system as you might assume either.
I am also quite sure that regardless of the fixed price/channel size advantages your approach claims as a benefit, it will in fact make it more prone to failure in changing market conditions and no less dependant on price (doesn't have to be lagging to be a price derivative that adds no extra information).
Whatever results you find it will eventually come down to a psychology test as well, no matter how automated anything is, getting large numbers of contacts filled is not a problem to be considered for a long time.
I am not a doomster, and you are of course free to completely prove me wrong, in which case I will take my hat off to you (I don't eat hats, and I don't expect to take it off, but just in case my humble pie is always ready.)
Just lower your expectations, and stay with the calmer attitude, dream as much as you need to but don't base any life plans or needs on this just yet awhile.
Well CLEARLY you CL guys will have to adjust the settings on the clouds because you shouldn't have this type of "cloud formation" on your chart. Clouds should be barely hovering above the price bars (see screenshot below).
Try chopping down the settings half and post again.
Well so far, it seems to fit on all eMinis (RTY, ES and NQ). Again I don't have the CL feed.
Also, my settings are just that, settings that I came up with by just looking at my chart like you will do for your CL. I never said those were the best settings because I don't know yet.
After verification, I have to take back what I said because as you can see on the NQ, the (6,8,10,12) settings doesn't fit as well as the (9,11,13,15) one.