Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I would still like to know --- those securities which are mandated to be in AAA-rated holdings, how is this calculated? Can the issuer just pick one of the three agencies and say, welp, S&P is at AA so we have to sell everything and move it to a different security? Or can they say, welp, Fitch and Moody's are at AAA so we'll just keep it here even though S&P says it's AA?
Is it an average or a majority? Or can they just decide who to look at and who to ignore?
Funny, I was thinking the same thing... It wouldn't surprise me if they suddenly announced a "gross miscalculation" and changed the rating back. But as they went to the step of actually proceeding with the downgrade, I would hope they have the backbone to defend their decision...
As for the good of the minority vs the majority, it will be interesting to see how extensive the civil unrest will become (if it comes to that)...
One thing's for certain, there are huge difficulties ahead. And no one wants to take the steps required to contain the problem...
Don't really know the answer myself but I did see an interview with Barney Frank (take it for what it's worth) and he said that "they" go with the highest rating out there. He pretty much says that it doesn't matter(that S&P downgrades) because the other agencies still have the higher rating. Wether this is the way it is or not remains to be seen for variuos reasons like that it was S&P that did the downgrade
Edit: Let me clarify, at the time of the interview Barney didn't mention any specific ratings agency...and my point is that since S&P is the big dog and what they say may have more weight in regards to nation ratings
What? You disagree with their decision and reasoning?
Lehman is an interesting case, though. Their competitors wanted them gone, and this was a good opportunity. GS and HSBC apparently did the most damage... Some people made a lot of money that collapse and the aftermath...
Broker: Advantage, Trading Technologies, OptionsCity, IQ Feed
Trading: CL, NG
Posts: 1,038 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 1,713
Thanks Received: 3,863
From what I've seen, most institutions have the specific agencies listed within their investment policy statement and I've seen S&P listed in quite a few of them. But the changes won't happen overnight I'm guessing. This will most likely take a decision by the trustee's, board of directors, etc. to make the adjustments. But given this has never happened before, we could see a knee-jerk reaction.
Also, from what I've read, the Fed has not changed it's capital requirements for banks because of this downgrade. This tells me that we could see some serious problems as the Fed inherently does the wrong thing in most cases. Additionally, we need to see what other countries do now that this has happened. They could easily ignore the Fed and change their capital requirements and cause a tail spin. In fact, that is what I expect to see as the playing field just got a little more level.
I think you guys are missing the wood for the trees.
The short term implications, such as what bond funds required to hold AAA paper will do, is done and dusted. For too long has the possibility of a downgrade been on the table for long enough for institutions and regulators to either prepare for adapting / exempting AAA mandates. And, in all honestly, it isn't the bond funds that are the immediate problem - it's the money market funds that pose the nearest threat. Still, come Monday morning I don't think the wheels are going to fall off the SP500 (if anything, corporates become more attractive), and the US bond market is the deepest in the world - all $700 trillion of it - and so, frankly, there isn't anywhere else to put your money anyway.
The importance of the downgrade is how it will be played out in the 2012 election; in their report, S&P make it plain that the deficit problems that are blossoming now were planted many years ago, and that the shambles of the past month has cemented the rating as confidence in bipartisan relationships has crumbled...
"The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as
America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective,
and less predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt
ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in
the debate over fiscal policy."
I posted the actual report in the elite section, but so far no-one seems to give a shit what S&P actually say, just make guesses on where the spoos will open...
Broker: Advantage, Trading Technologies, OptionsCity, IQ Feed
Trading: CL, NG
Posts: 1,038 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 1,713
Thanks Received: 3,863
I would agree with your thoughts on money market funds. There is the potential for a breaking of the buck. But Bond Funds are only a slice of the US treasury ownership pie that this downgrade affects. There are huge pension funds, endowment funds, sovereign funds, bank holdings for collateral that has potentially created an adverse/material event that can have a knee-jerk scramble to rebalance their positions to other AAA rated securities. As mentioned before, the question is which agencies will these institutions lean more on? From being in the investment management business my entire career, I can assure you that I've seen a majority of these entities place a high emphasis on the S&P's ratings. That is why this is huge.
I think everyone cares about what the S&P has to say. Doesn't mean everyone needs to comment on it though. As for what the market opens at, who cares. Just trade what you see on your screen...