Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
If you like the idea of selling calls then I'd focus on individual equities rather than indexes. There's a much greater chance of finding overvalued stocks vs an overvalued index. Yes /ES is on a hot streak like we can't believe but a broad index decline of 10% or more isn't as likely as say Apple staying flat or Tesla dropping 15%. My brother and I talked about this strategy and he prefers it. Selling puts to buy the stock and then selling covered calls, weeklies, until it gets called away. Rinse/lather/repeat. He trades with Ferrari, Tesla, Netflix, and a few others.
The only drawback with this is using margin is a BIG NO NO. You get close to the money or even at the money and take the assignment if and when it happens. Just a thought...
I don't understand why you think 10-20 contracts can be managed but hundreds not. It all depends on your account size. There is plenty of volume in ES puts for 3rd week expiration.
The strategy worked fine during the Aug 2015 crash. It covers flash crashes. It only doesn't cover slow 20+% drops.
I'm not going to avoid trading a strategy that has 100% winners for years and years because just maybe 2008 might be happening sometime in the future. I trust my ability to see that coming.
I am going to use TFOpts's strategy for my new positions. I will sell two ESu7p1960 and buy three ESu7p1750. IM is $419. Friday's settlement was $160. I will use 4xIM. This could give me a 3.0% ROI if I exit at 50% drop in 30 days.
I finally have historical results using protective puts. The scenario that seemed to work the best is to buy the puts when you reach about 50% of margin. Higher than 50% and the puts aren't protective enough, you're buying them too late; lower than 50% and you hit the buy button too often which drags down your overall returns.
Other assumptions used:
100% of initial premium is used to purchase the new put so that at best it's a break-even trade
If you buy a protective put, ride the option to expiration to get a 0% ROI
Here are results for naked puts. Note that from 2013-16 a -5 delta put at 6xIM would have worked 100% of the time. So I tested at 5xIM to introduce margin calls. Whether you have a protective put or not, losses can be disastrous (compound monthly losses of 99% of the account). The only protection you get from the additional puts is a marginal improvement in the number of scenarios that go on margin call (from 1.3% to 0.9%).
Spread results are below. Again, not much impact, just a few less scenarios going on margin call; but losses when a call is received are just as large or even larger because of the additional premium cost.
Overall buying protective puts may not be the most efficient risk mitigation strategy. When margins have increased by a factor of 5 and premium by a factor of 10, having one additional long put far OTM hardly provides any protection.
Ok Ron I appreciate your comments and I see where you are coming from. That's what makes a market.
However , Long Term Capital Management also did 20% or so first year and then something like 40% the next year before blowing up later on. This was doing bond arbitrage with some of the smartest (or not so smart lol) minds.
Goldman and JPM would kill for the returns you posted above (between 20-32 percent per year). And so would all the billion dollar funds. Bill Ackman and others would solely employ this strategy.
I understand the backtest shows it works. I'm also familiar with the fact that Warren Buffet sells massive amounts of index puts going years out. However, you simply cannot compare it. Berkshire is in another planet with their billions compared to a retail trader.
And why did you say that 10-20 contracts can't be managed ?? It certainly can , especially with $100k-$500k account.
This is what I'm saying all along: you can easily sell 10-20 contracts for the 13 times per year or so that your study suggests is possible , while trading with a $100k-$500k account . This will certainly add a nice return to your account.
But going into the hundreds of contracts is not feasible. You simply can't scale up just because the bids are there Ron.
The best strategy proposed so far for relatively safe returns is 1 short ES put at -5 delta and 2 long ES puts at -1.5 delta with 6 x IM and DTE around 100 days, exiting when premium = 50% of initial premium. …