Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
But whereas selling FOTM options is a trade that is supposed to work independently of the move of the underlying, selling ATM options only works in case you are correct on the direction of the move of the underlying.
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals, U308 and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,059 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,410
Thanks Received: 10,226
Let me start by saying this is not intended to advocate shorting vol to collect the premium, but again I would point out there is both risk and reward. For example from Friday......
Thankfully I didn't sell this on Friday - as I felt the risk was greater than the previous week and the reward being offered was considerably less. But even if I had, and even with the market down 6.8% (2764) the strangle is only 140.5/143.5, which is a loss of 54 or just over 60%. So even if you closed it now and wrote it off as a bad trade....
if you normally close your trades with a 50% win... you only offset 1.2 of your winning trades and as an option seller I suspect your win rate is significantly higher than 55% needed to cover this.
If I had sold it and closed it now, then it would only be 54% of my gain from the previous week. Net net on the two trades about +46.
Issue is what if this was your first trade without having been a winner earlier.. or worse still this is your second trade and the first one was bad timing and you struggled to come out a winner...????..
Is it worth the reward trying to put these on in this volatile environment where it might be just easier to pick levels and enter with limited stops?
After having gone through this for the last few weeks, not sure this is the worth the emotional aggravation
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals, U308 and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,059 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,410
Thanks Received: 10,226
But that's the case with all trading. Even with a 65% win rate you have 12.25% chance of both your first two trades being losers, so for one in eight traders that will happen. (Of course most new traders probably don't have a 65% win rate so it is in reality even higher.!) This is the beauty of Monte Carlo simulations. Not only do your expected distributions give estimated payout and strategy volatility numbers, but they also give you 'Risk of Ruin' numbers. I'd go on to say that the 'Risk of Ruin' of many strategies are probably considerably higher than people think. Maybe not just because of price risk but because of excessive size and leverage and also liquidity risk. Because when things go really really wrong - the liquidity often isn't there to get out in an orderly manner if you have size on.
For professional traders selling vol isn't about picking levels it's about expected risk vs expected reward. But yes if your trying to sell options as a directional trade, maybe picking levels and managing stops is a better way to do it. Your really using different tools, in different ways, to try and achieve the same result.
Ha I hear you. Short vol rarely is fun when markets get interesting! I wish I could say it doesn't bother me at all but in reality I'm so busy juggling so many things I rarely have the time to worry about any one position.
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals, U308 and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,059 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,410
Thanks Received: 10,226
That's an excellent point Ron and not just specific to options. It's also something very difficult to plan for. I've seen several occasions in Natural Gas where a significant increase in margins has forced liquidations which have in turn moved the market.
Arent a lot of the 'increase in margin notions' more relevant to naked options?
If I am selling a defined risk vertical spread.... either far OTM, or closer ATM - isnt the 'increase in margin' problem somewhat less relevant ?
Yes, if you're trading limited risk spreads, the increased margins aren't going to have nearly as much an effect on you as someone selling naked options.... in theory. Some brokers will increase margins even more (on top of the SPAN increase), and ignore the fact that your spread risk is limited.
Mike Murphy - Director of Trading
Use Promo Code FUTURES.IO for $0.45 futures commissions, $0.19 micro commissions HERE. *Promotion only available to new customers. Other fees such as exchange and NFA still apply*
Mike Murphy | Director of Trading
Ironbeam Futures
Phone: 312-765-7228 | [email protected]
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals, U308 and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,059 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,410
Thanks Received: 10,226
SPAN Margining is very complicated especially when you take into account the portfolio effect of multiple positions. Simplified the SPAN system shocks your position in multiple ways by moving price and volatility to predefined extremes and the worst case scenario is the margin requirement. For a simple option spread the margin requirement for a spread between A and B is I believe just (A-B). Hence if A and B both increase by x% then (A-B) also increases by x%. In reality it's no not that simple, and it's non linear so there isn't an easy rule of thumb. But answering your question, I believe in its simplest form, in an absolute dollars it will be less but in percentage terms I believe it will be similar.
Again, on a relative basis I respectively disagree. If you have an argument as to why I may be wrong I would be interested to hear it.
I did run several scenario's on the lastest margin increase (March 4th) to try and provide supporting data for my case but the results are hard to interpret which isn't surprising given the underlying price and volatility change.