Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Je ne sais pas s'il y a encore quelqu'un qui a un cerveau là-bas et est capable de tirer la sonnette d'alarme sur ce qu'il est en train de se passer.
Pour avoir connu plusieurs crash, notamment ceux de 2000/2003 et 2008/2009, je commence à être assez en colère.
D'abord parce que j'ai des positions baissières massacrées par la compression de la volatilité et les minables AR intraday n'y font rien. Et puis faire remonter les marchés de manière artificiellle jusqu'au jour où on se dit ah ben le fondamental ne suit pas, c'est assez stupide comme stratégie.
Ce décompte est bon. Ce qui nous intéresse immédiatement c'est le vert. Le fait que le S&P monte au dessus de 1645 est juste un excès.
A tout moment on peut démarrer une conso dont l'objectif est à 1530/40.
Le CAC n'a pas fait de nouveau plus haut par-rapport à vendredi malgré cette hausse de 14 points sur le S&P. Cette "sous-performance" est un élément qui va dans le sens de la conso.
D'un point de vue objectif à la baisse sur le CAC, on pourrait bien baisser sous 3700 car le S&P va partir de plus haut.
Please excuse Google translate and English response.
For sure these markets are an immense source of frustration because we expect things to be in certain ranges - BUT - we started a new Gann 60yr (the big one) cycle in 2009 and the longwave has also either ended 2009 or will end soon in 2013/2016. At best for the bears the 4 year bull is a monster 'B' wave (the most difficult environment of all to trade.)
Throw in the ridiculous activity of thin-air credit creators, banksters and politicians (play with fire and dud promises only) and we have a recipe for massive confusion of all parties, all we can do is keep eyes and minds wide open. I do not think the world will be what anybody expects in 10 years time.
The price mechanism is still the most efficient carrier of information ever invented -at the moment we are without one.
Hi @AnasParis, Sorry I have no suitable charts in this area at the moment, I am just aware that sometimes the starts and ends of cycles can be much stronger than many expect. As yet we have no evidence of long-term bearish behaviour in these markets and should at least await until it shows up in outside weekly and monthly reversal bars. Until then there is nothing to say new highs cannot continue to be made for a long time yet, with some serious pullbacks along the way for sure.
Even the collapse of '08-'09 took 17 months (interestingly a typical panic phase length according to Mr Armstrong) so we should not try to dictate our trading stances according to our longer term fears. Once some serious levels of support have cracked then maybe she dies, maybe not.
I am focussed on building a short term trade plan at the moment but will re-kindle my cycle work when I have chance, all I can say is that I saw enough to suggest the (surprise to me) possibility that new 17-18 year and 8.6 year cycles may well have started at the 2009 low as well as larger cycles, in which case there was more energy present than we might have expected, regardless of what the crazies in power have also done.
I have other upside down end of world views but am continually learning to keep one eye in each direction.
Cheers