Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
When trading options, what is a good ratio of probability vs reward:risk? When buying naked options, the risk is capped with exponential returns possible, but the probability is low.
Credit spreads: say you are collecting .50 in premium with a maximum risk of 1.50. but there is only a 15% chance of the market fully expiring past your purchased option. (100 trade sample: 85 trades gross .50 = 42.5, 15 losses x 1.5 = 22.5, 20 profit) Is this favorable? What would be?
If doing an Iron condor, would you keep strikes equal from the current underlying or extend one side of it based on probability?
Just looking for general discussion or guidelines that others use when putting on credit spreads. I've recently started tracking some Iron Condors in a sim acct and am looking for some input from others.
My research is showing that you should be able to calculate probability based on models using volume, greeks, volatility etc.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
from my limited understanding iron anything is going to limit your rate of return, two great option traders i have study one preferred butterflies and other strangles, they both actively manged the trade after it was on. but as always you are going to need to know your greeks and what conditions are needed to place the trade.
"Learning to Trade: The Cost Of Tuition"
- a roadmap of my lessons learned as taught by the market
I too like strangles, and had success with them in higher volatility environments (in the es). Strangles in stocks seem more dangerous with out the out of the money protection like you have in an iron condor. You never know when a buyout, lawsuit etc will move a stock exponentially
I put this trade on in LULU on Monday. I chose short strikes about 10% out of the money on the weeklies. Then the next strike for the long protection option.
so using the above mentioned probabilities of about 20%, if I do this trade 100 times, 80 times I would make 685, or 54800 total and I would lose $1815 20 times or $36300. Leaving a net profit of approximately $18500. IB includes commission in their p&l calculations, but trading ten lots at a buck a piece would be $20 per rt or $2000 on 100 trades so the 18500 is 16500.
assuming I can trade weeklies, It would take two years to fulfill this example. If you calculate roi based on the maximum risk taken each round turn(i'm not sure what was charged for margin) 16500/1715=962% in two years.
If the first 20 trades went bad, that would be a cost of $34300. then your roi would be 16500/34300 = 48% in two years.
Still I'm wondering if this is valid statistically and if my calculations are correct?
I should mention that I came across this stock using a high implied volatility over historical stock scan at IB. I would post a screen shot, but implied vol isn't coming up probably because the mkt is closed.
using the same criteria, I have the same spread on in GES. April expiry though so a few weeks left. Put on when the stock was 27.92 on 3-12-13. It closed Friday just over 25.00. Implied vol vs historical was 49.4 vs 27.7. my position is:
Long April 23P
Short April 25P
Short April 30C
Long April 32C
My short put is ATM. Spread is slightly in my favor:
here is shot of the option chains when I put the trade on and after Friday's close: