Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Hello everybody
i just open an account with AMP and want try SC+CQG .
seems from what i'm reading that CQG is one of the best or the best to provide accurate data and submit orders .
previously i used CTS T4 as data feed for ICE and to execute orders
I'd like to receive feedback from AMP users , particularly from whom using SC with CQG
also if someone used CTS before to use CQG and can write the differences found
and if is using CQG and SC datafeed together
i tried to speak with some assistants but seemed they didn't understand the questions
someone here is trading Eurex with the above combo and is using sc data feed for eurex and only CQG from AMP to submit orders ?
i mean do i have to pay 23$ monthly for CQG Eurex ,though i don't want use it as datafeed ?
does AMP + CQG provide stable connection and accurate tick by tick intraday and historical intraday (tick) data ?
do you know how much historical intraday data is available?
Every broker does provide its privileges, but we do provide historical tick data with Rithmic W/Sierra.
Matt
Trading futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. You may lose more than your initial investment. All posts are opinions and do not claim to be facts. Please conduct your own due diligence. Use only Risk capital when trading Futures.
1 800 771 6748 local 561 367 8686 email [email protected]
sorry to reply only now ,
I'm using SC data-feed and CQG to submit order , all works fine.
so far i have to pay both CQG and SC data-feed plus 10$ for FIX.
from 2015 additional cost for Sc datafeed are 3,25$ for top of the book or 15,75 for full DOM.
one can choose to use webapi and avoid 10$ of FIX but seems FIX works better and for only 10$
I still use FIX
What lead you to think that? I've just started to use CQG/AMP with Multicharts and there is definitely a difference when I compare it to IQ-feed when using tick based charts. The time based charts seem to be identical. When I load up a range bar chart using CGQ there seems to be tiny gaps between the candles, which is something I don't get with IQ-feed when I compare.
I was under the impression that IQ has unfiltered tick data. That could be the difference. I think i is one of only a few data feeds that offer unfitered tick data.
Even though the CQG API is better in MC now, I always had issues with the CQG API locking up and having memory leak issues. Other users say that CQG is now working great with MC.
I still find that there is a substantial increase in memory usage when running MC with CQG.
It runs much leaner when I use just rithmic, so that is what I do.