Dark Theme
Light Theme
Trading Articles
Article Categories
Article Tools
Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to
register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community.
It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Intel processor chip defect Kernel memory leaking
Updated January 8, 2018
Top Posters
looks_one
Blash
with 7 posts (21 thanks)
looks_two
sam028
with 6 posts (32 thanks)
looks_3
xplorer
with 3 posts (7 thanks)
looks_4
Cerberus
with 1 posts (2 thanks)
Best Posters
looks_one
sam028
with 5.3 thanks per post
looks_two
choke35
with 4 thanks per post
looks_3
Blash
with 3 thanks per post
looks_4
xplorer
with 2.3 thanks per post
trending_up
6,756 views
thumb_up
74 thanks given
group
13 followers
forum
24 posts
attach_file
2 attachments
Intel processor chip defect Kernel memory leaking
January 4th, 2018, 02:20 PM
Posts: 3,765 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 3,825
Thanks Received: 4,629
xplorer
Well he's not stupid
Would be useful if and when they publish the specific processors affected.
It seems all Intel processor are affected, not AMD's.
You can download the attached file and unzip/run to see if your machine is impacted.
If this are okay you should see something like this:
Success requires no deodorant! (Sun Tzu)
Attached Files
Elite Membership required to download: SpecuCheck.zip
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
Best Threads (Most Thanked) in the last 7 days on NexusFi
January 4th, 2018, 02:51 PM
London UK
Experience: Beginner
Platform: CQG
Broker: S5
Trading: Futures
Posts: 5,995 since Sep 2015
Thanks Given: 15,542
Thanks Received: 15,493
sam028
Their processors are affected but the probability of being impacted is lower than on cloud providers services (AWS, Google CE, ...). On your own PC you're usually the only user so you have to have a virus or a malware activating this thing. On AWS EC2 a client VM could impact the hypervisor (the physical server) and impacting the other clients.
So the main risk is for some cloud providers, for a "normal" user it's as risky a getting a bad malware. The Wannacry ransomware was much worst, but let's see what's happening next.
Okay, so what you're saying is, they are affected but the risk assessment is low on the end-user/standalone side.
Makes sense.
Thanks also for the tool!
January 4th, 2018, 03:09 PM
Chicago, IL
Legendary Market Chamois
Experience: None
Platform: NT8,NT7,TWS
Broker: InteractiveBrokers, S5T, IQFeed
Trading: The one I'm creating in the present....Index Futures mini/micro, ZF
Posts: 2,311 since Nov 2011
Thanks Given: 7,341
Thanks Received: 4,518
sam028
It seems all Intel processor are affected, not AMD's.
You can download the attached file and unzip/run to see if your machine is impacted.
If this are okay you should see something like this:
Many thanks ....greatly appreciated .......!!!!!!!!!!
Ron
...My calamity is My providence, outwardly it is fire and vengeance, but inwardly it is light and mercy...
The steed of this Valley is pain; and if there be no pain this journey will never end.
B uy L ow A nd S ell H igh (read left to right or right to left....lol)
January 4th, 2018, 03:14 PM
Chicago, IL
Legendary Market Chamois
Experience: None
Platform: NT8,NT7,TWS
Broker: InteractiveBrokers, S5T, IQFeed
Trading: The one I'm creating in the present....Index Futures mini/micro, ZF
Posts: 2,311 since Nov 2011
Thanks Given: 7,341
Thanks Received: 4,518
More from my news feed.....
Quoting
03 Jan 14:03 [INTC] Spokesperson: exploits do not have potential to corrupt or modify data; many types of computing devices, with many different vendors’ processors and operating systems, are susceptible to these exploits Intel and other technology companies have been made aware of new security research describing software analysis methods that, when used for malicious purposes, have the potential to improperly gather sensitive data from computing devices that are operating as designed. Intel believes these exploits do not have the potential to corrupt, modify or delete data.Recent reports that these exploits are caused by a “bug” or a “flaw” and are unique to Intel products are incorrect. Based on the analysis to date, many types of computing devices — with many different vendors’ processors and operating systems — are susceptible to these exploits.Intel is committed to product and customer security and is working closely with many other technology companies, including AMD, ARM Holdings and several operating system vendors, to develop an industry-wide approach to resolve this issue promptly and constructively. Intel has begun providing software and firmware updates to mitigate these exploits. Contrary to some reports, any performance impacts are workload-dependent, and, for the average computer user, should not be significant and will be mitigated over time.Intel is committed to the industry best practice of responsible disclosure of potential security issues, which is why Intel and other vendors had planned to disclose this issue next week when more software and firmware updates will be available. However, Intel is making this statement today because of the current inaccurate media reports.Check with your operating system vendor or system manufacturer and apply any available updates as soon as they are available. Following good security practices that protect against malware in general will also help protect against possible exploitation until updates can be applied.Intel believes its products are the most secure in the world and that, with the support of its partners, the current solutions to this issue provide the best possible security for its customers.Link:
https://newsroom.intel.com/news/intel-responds-to-security-research-findings/** NOTE: Earlier: INTC Weakness attributed to The Register report: 'Kernel memory leaking' Intel processor design flaw forces Linux, Windows redesign - Source TradeTheNews.com
Ron
...My calamity is My providence, outwardly it is fire and vengeance, but inwardly it is light and mercy...
The steed of this Valley is pain; and if there be no pain this journey will never end.
B uy L ow A nd S ell H igh (read left to right or right to left....lol)
January 5th, 2018, 02:01 AM
Vancouver Canada
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: TOS, IB
Trading: es ym etf's
Posts: 35 since Feb 2011
Thanks Given: 24
Thanks Received: 26
Blash
More from my news feed.....
Ron
For 10 years this flaw / bug was living undetected on our machines and suddenly "they" decided to go public. Hard to believe that there isn't more to this story.
Nobody wants to compromise speed, not 5% and for sure not 30% or even worse. At some point a solution to recover the speed will be offered, but not for free.
.
Sent from my YOGA Tablet 2-1050F using Tapatalk
January 5th, 2018, 04:06 AM
London/UK
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NinjaTrader, JST
Broker: Dorman Trading / CQG
Trading: ES
Posts: 6 since Aug 2016
Thanks Given: 4
Thanks Received: 4
sam028
Their processors are affected but the probability of being impacted is lower than on cloud providers services (AWS, Google CE, ...). On your own PC you're usually the only user so you have to have a virus or a malware activating this thing. On AWS EC2 a client VM could impact the hypervisor (the physical server) and impacting the other clients.
So the main risk is for some cloud providers, for a "normal" user it's as risky a getting a bad malware. The Wannacry ransomware was much worst, but let's see what's happening next.
Are you saying we shouldn't get the update/fix that will come?
Because I can agree is not security issue for us, but if the update everyone and speed goes down it does bother me
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
January 5th, 2018, 05:06 AM
Posts: 3,765 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 3,825
Thanks Received: 4,629
sylvestersergio
Are you saying we shouldn't get the update/fix that will come?
Because I can agree is not security issue for us, but if the update everyone and speed goes down it does bother me
Sent from my Pixel using Tapatalk
With the information available now I'll say wait & see, don't rush on the fix yet.
Success requires no deodorant! (Sun Tzu)
January 5th, 2018, 05:31 AM
Posts: 3,765 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 3,825
Thanks Received: 4,629
But update your web browsers, this is where the risk is higher.
Keep Firefox updated (v57) and use this trick for Google Chrome.
Success requires no deodorant! (Sun Tzu)
January 5th, 2018, 12:06 PM
On the road
Webinar Host
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: TradingView
Broker: Oanda
Trading: FX
Posts: 2,512 since Feb 2017
Thanks Given: 17,582
Thanks Received: 9,752
January 5th, 2018, 04:25 PM
Tucson
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Stage5
Trading: CL, YM
Posts: 209 since Jan 2011
Thanks Given: 137
Thanks Received: 233
There is a lot of talk about security due to the kernal flaw, but what about memory leaks and cleanup? I suppose the Garbage Collection will be done by .NET? Is there a new .NET coming? Does anyone know if Ninja will adopt the use of a newer .NET? There have been a lot of people that have memory issues with NT.
Thanks
Bob
Last Updated on January 8, 2018