Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 200,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- discounts are available after registering.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Is there an indicator that uses the modified formula for the population variance?
Am I correct in assuming that if one standard deviation represents 68.2% of the data points, that by simply using a standard deviation of 1.0263929 to represent 70% of the data points is not accurate because of the Gaussian, bell-shape?
All indicators that I know (including StdDev, Bollinger Bands and the VWAP) use the simple formula.
The rule that one standard deviation represents approximately 68.2% of all data points is only true for normal distributions. It can be entirely false for other distributions. Prices are not distributed normally. Price volume distributions can follow anything from lognormal to power laws. On many days the volume does not even follow a unimodal (single peek) distribution, but you will often observe double or even triple distribution days. Although the standard deviation cannot be used to describe a defined percentage of volume, it is used by many traders, because it is easy to calculate.