NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Standard Deviation on Vertical Spreads


Discussion in Options

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one DarkPoolTrading with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    2. looks_two optionNinja with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Quick Summary with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    4. looks_4 linker33 with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    1. trending_up 3,705 views
    2. thumb_up 2 thanks given
    3. group 3 followers
    1. forum 3 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)
linker33
Boise, ID / USA
 
Posts: 9 since Apr 2015
Thanks Given: 3
Thanks Received: 1

So this may be a stupid question.... on a spread such as an IC or Strangle, setting short strikes at about 16% OTM would equal 1 standard deviation.
On a Vertical Spread, does setting the one short strike at 32% also equate to 1 standard deviation? Since you retain the 68% ITM, I'm thinking you retain the same risk by shifting the risk from one side to the other?

Or is that not correct?


Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
S&P 500 Holds the Line: No Fast Track for SpaceX, Op …
Stocks and ETFs
UCL Final Kicks Off at Noon ET: PSG at 56.5% as Iran May …
Prediction Markets & Event Contracts
Rubios Good News Within Hours and the 30-Day Math: Why H …
Prediction Markets & Event Contracts
Iran Deal "In Review" at 87% on Deadline Day - …
Prediction Markets & Event Contracts
May 26 Deadline Dies at 7.5% as US Strikes Iran During C …
Prediction Markets & Event Contracts
 
  #3 (permalink)
 
DarkPoolTrading's Avatar
 DarkPoolTrading   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 1,034 since May 2012
Thanks Given: 1,244
Thanks Received: 1,328



linker33 View Post
So this may be a stupid question.... on a spread such as an IC or Strangle, setting short strikes at about 16% OTM would equal 1 standard deviation.
On a Vertical Spread, does setting the one short strike at 32% also equate to 1 standard deviation? Since you retain the 68% ITM, I'm thinking you retain the same risk by shifting the risk from one side to the other?

Or is that not correct?

Correct. Using the often times useful method of using delta to determine the ITM/OTM probabilities, a strangle or IC with short strikes at 16 delta would have +- 68% probability of being OTM. A vertical spread with short strike at 32 delta would also have +- 68% probability of being OTM.


Diversification is the only free lunch
Follow me on X Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #4 (permalink)
optionNinja
San Francisco, CA
 
Posts: 8 since Dec 2016
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Received: 13

Delta can under certain assumptions be seen as the probability or likelihood that an option will expire in-the-money. So a 20% delta call could be thought to have a 20% chance of expiring in-the-money.

This probability is highly theoretical. It is not a FACT about the options that will always be true. All it means is that if every assumption in the pricing model that has been used to formulate the delta turns out to be true, then the delta can be interpreted as the probability of expiring in-the-money, in some cases.

This is very unlikely to be the case consistently or even frequently. Volatility can be higher or lower than expected. Interest rates can move. Indeed, for some options where cost of carry or dividends are relevant, this interpretation of delta is even more precarious. Nevertheless, as a rule of thumb, option delta as the probability of expiring in-the-money is undoubtedly useful to know.


Reply With Quote
Thanked by:




Last Updated on January 8, 2017


© 2026 NexusFi®, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Downloads - Top
no new posts