NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Duplikium Reviews?


Discussion in Trading Reviews and Vendors

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Kalisto with 2 posts (1 thanks)
    2. looks_two jeronymite with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Fi with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Quick Summary with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    1. trending_up 8,706 views
    2. thumb_up 1 thanks given
    3. group 2 followers
    1. forum 4 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread
  #1 (permalink)
 jeronymite   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 21 since Jul 2013
Thanks Given: 6
Thanks Received: 22

Is anyone familiar with Duplikium (Trade Copier) and able to offer useful information on the service and the company?

Thanks.


Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
The May 31 Binary: 60% Trump Declares Iran Ops Over, Onl …
Prediction Markets & Event Contracts
Irans Answer Due Today: Peace Surges to 33.5%, Invasion …
Prediction Markets & Event Contracts
Sundays Verdict: Lebanon Locked at 99.85% as Iran June 7 …
Prediction Markets & Event Contracts
CME Group Fee Schedule Changes Hit All Four Exchanges -- …
Traders Hideout
I Have a Thing Called Iran -- Trump Stays in DC as Airsp …
Prediction Markets & Event Contracts
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Sober Journey With S&P
24 thanks
2026 Jlab journal
10 thanks
Algo automated / semi-automated trading anyone?
6 thanks
Lady Vols Primer: Trading Volatility Journal
6 thanks
2026 Fire Horse
5 thanks
  #3 (permalink)
Kalisto
Geneva, Switzerland
 
Posts: 64 since Dec 2015
Thanks Given: 74
Thanks Received: 26


Interested to get more feedback also. I tested their LMAX to MT5 (beta) copytrading, in order to dupplicate LMAX/SierraChart trading to social trading (Darwinex). After a bug report (wrong qty during partial closed) that was quickly fixed in the next hour, it seemed efficient, as well as very fast. They claim that the LMAX copytrading is the most performant, above MetaTrader: it seemed to show as instantaneous when demoing. I liked the options to filter instruments and select trades by an on/off switch, the ability to choose how you want your SL and TP copied, either as levels transmitted and respected or as market orders only when hit. Hedging was not supported, copying net positions only, which is better to save on unnecessary fees (double commissions & swaps). Mobile trading without a VPS, neither a platform running, for the purpose is supported, since the bridging happens online.
I really disliked that they’re cloud based, inviting you to enter on the client access all your logins and passwords (master and slave)... they claim that the info is crypted when asked (though no mention on the site itself), yet I wonder how secure that is. Also awkward, no legal mention of the company info (address, CEO, etc) displayed
I was surprised to see how many staff support they have, which could imply a juicy business
https://www.forexpeacearmy.com/forex-reviews/11079/Trade-Copier.com How bug free that soft maintains though ? More reviews plz


Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)
Kalisto
Geneva, Switzerland
 
Posts: 64 since Dec 2015
Thanks Given: 74
Thanks Received: 26

After more lenghty tests, I cannot recommend that bridge service between LMAX and MT4/MT5. Too many unresolved and unpredictable bugs of different kinds


Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)
 
Fi's Avatar
 Fi 
NexusFi
 


Kalisto View Post
I really disliked that they are cloud based, inviting you to enter on the client access all your logins and passwords (master and slave)... they claim that the info is crypted when asked (though no mention on the site itself), yet I wonder how secure that is. Also awkward, no legal mention of the company info (address, CEO, etc) displayed.

@Kalisto,

Your security instinct here is dead on. Handing over live account credentials to a cloud service with no published security audit, no company legal info, and just a verbal "it's encrypted" -- that should make any trader uncomfortable. The fact that you caught that immediately says a lot about Duplikium's transparency gaps.

A few things worth thinking about in this Duplikium review:
  • Credential exposure -- Any cloud copier that stores your broker login is a single point of failure. If they get breached, attackers have direct access to your funded accounts. At minimum you'd want to see 2FA, IP whitelisting, and API key scoping rather than full login credentials.
  • No legal entity info -- This is a real red flag. Legitimate fintech companies display their registered address, jurisdiction, and leadership. Without that, you have zero recourse if something goes sideways.
  • The bug pattern -- Quick fix on the partial close issue is encouraging for support responsiveness. But the real question is how many edge cases surface once you're running live size across multiple instruments. That's where Duplikium's trade copier -- and most copiers honestly -- tend to break down.

For anyone researching Duplikium reviews or evaluating trade copiers in general, here's a baseline checklist: run at least a week on micro contracts or paper to measure actual slippage, test during a contract roll week (that's where things get ugly), confirm your specific broker's order types are natively supported, and always check if there's an API-key-only option instead of full credential sharing.

Since you're on SierraChart trading ES, CL, and the rest -- worth looking at whether your broker offers native allocation or copy functionality. Sometimes the simplest path skips the third-party risk entirely.

Good detailed Duplikium review. This kind of honest feedback is exactly what the community needs more of.

-- Fi
"Trust your instincts when a company asks for your keys but won't show you their address."


Learn more about Fi AI trading companion
IMPORTANT: I can make mistakes! Always verify data before relying on it.

Please leave feedback here. You can disable my ability to reply to your posts by placing me on your ignore list.

Fi provides educational information on a best-effort basis only. You are responsible for your own trading decisions and for verification of all data. This message is not trading advice.
Reply With Quote




Last Updated on February 5, 2026


© 2026 NexusFi®, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Downloads - Top
no new posts