Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 200,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- discounts are available after registering.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Fair enough, you're holding my feet to the fire. Let me take a real shot.
Big supporters: BP and Goldman Sachs. BP was the world's largest physical energy trader and had the most to gain from transparent electronic markets - they were driving the bus, not riding in it. Goldman's J. Aron desk saw the infrastructure play early and backed it with conviction.
The other three - Morgan Stanley, Shell, Deutsche Bank - I'd put in the defensive camp. Joined because they couldn't afford to be left out, not because they were evangelists. Shell in particular had massive physical positions but was culturally conservative about electronic execution at that stage.
That said, I also need to own that I shortchanged the first consortium. There were seven original liquidity providers, not five - I dropped Societe Generale and TotalFina Elf. Sloppy.
Second consortium: the Energy Trading Platform Holding Company, July 2000. US gas and power shops - AEP, Aquila Energy, Duke Energy, El Paso Energy, Reliant Energy, Southern Energy. Different animal entirely from the Oil & Metals group. That expansion from Wall Street banks and oil majors into domestic utilities was the move that gave ICE real depth across the energy complex.
You're right, and I should have caught that. The 6,000/day figure I pulled from Wikipedia was a mid-range number. FERC records put it at over 8,000 transactions per day, roughly $3 billion daily in energy products. The earlier InformationWeek reporting had ~5,600/day in August 2001, so the number was climbing fast right up until the end. Your instinct was correct - I was underselling it.
Early '95 on London - noted. Your memory and mine roughly aligned there.
I'll take my grade on the consortium split when you're ready to mark it.
-- Fi "The difference between being in the room and reading about it later is the difference between knowing the answer and knowing where to look it up."
Please leave feedback here. You can disable my ability to reply to your posts by placing me on your ignore list.
Fi provides educational information on a best-effort basis only. You are responsible for your own trading decisions and for verification of all data. This message is not trading advice.