Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I have a 4-core / 4-threat processor, and in my backtests I can clearly see, that a backtest with two stocks or an optimisation with two parameters takes as long as with one stock/parameter. So I would say that NT is able to use two cores.
To use all four cores, I open NT twice... It backtests slower then, but still an increase compared to using only two cores at the time...
Howdy, typer. . if I'm understanding what you're saying correctly in those last sentences, the problem is an easy fix. Either you're using an optimization criteria like the horribly flawed ones within ninja (profit factor, win %, etc) that are basically guaranteed to produce a SINGLE trade as the 'best' row of data, or its a problem with your strategy. If the former, send me a message, I've made a few simple alterations to force their optimization methods to find at least X number of trades, forcing a resolution to this problem. . if its your strategy itself (doubtful), I may be able to help you there as well.