wldman 

Negative. Sorry for the extra bother Mike. If there is a way to resend I will take care to be on the lookout. -Dan

Ok, I'll be looking into this. I figured it was just stuck in spam due to new domain name, we need more time and exposure.

Big Mike 

I'm not going into details on this publicly for obvious reasons but you can rest assured I understand what the market wants and hope to meet it there. Our MC privacy policy is not yet finished, but it will be before we go into live mode. You'll be able to intuit your answer there I would imagine.

Are you going to redact private information from the statements prior to sending to ChatGPT (or similar company)? I can't imagine room leaders would want these AI companies training models on their broker statements.

planetkill 

Are you going to redact private information from the statements prior to sending to ChatGPT (or similar company)? I can't imagine room leaders would want these AI companies training models on their broker statements.

Yes of course. Included in my prior response. I already stated what we are looking for and what we don't care about, and we are using AI forensics. Not going to say more. You'll be able to answer the third party question by reviewing our privacy policy once we are live and it's ready. I can't answer more than that right now.

Big Mike 

Ok, I'll be looking into this. I figured it was just stuck in spam due to new domain name, we need more time and exposure.

Would you be able to say if waitlist signups from this past week will make it into the beta? Interested in bringing over some         buddies and just want to make sure I don't miss the invite due to new domain reputation.

Any thoughts to using a transactional email service like postmark while markets.chat builds reputation?

Edit: Is the word disc@rd banned? it keeps auto replacing it with spaces