Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I thought that occured on the gap up from December 10th. It re-tested it that day and once again 2 days later. Every time it's rallied and it had rejected the highs, forming candles with upper (distribution) wicks. It has left me somewhat perplexed because chart-wise I never saw the 28.86-28.90 area as resistance.
The way I see it is on the attached chart. Aggressive traders enter immediately they notice reluctance to go back to creek jumped over. And put their stops below the demand bar that did the jumping. Conservative traders wait for a demand bar(up bar showing ease of movement with wide spread and comparatively better volume) to appear.
Ya, I guess you're right. The volume on the re-tests of the creek has been meager. No sign of a true demand bar to show buyers re-entering the picture.
My thoughts are on the attachment. Try to think in terms of the balance between buyers and sellers, in every range you encounter, and determine who has the upper hand, hence which direction the market would go.
Always thinking in terms of accumulation or distribution has a way of making one biased towards a direction and for many it makes for refusing to admit error and shifting towards the proper direction. Sometimes it also causes confusion as , everything could point to accumulation in your mind and analyses but the market would sell greatly for a while before going back up.
Markets would ultimately go where they would go, even the heavy investors (smart money) get it wrong many times. So first be sure to understand the concepts of listening to the markets and then look for where the balance shifts always.
Remember a simple concept that will keep you out of trouble: "Price Structure Trumps Everything Else". ... And I mean EVERYTHING else. That includes volume.
Volume is just a supporting cast to price structure.. In the case you reference , price tried to break out of a trading range twice. Both times the break out bar could not close outside of the range even though on higher volume. This is indicative of a Wyckoff spring or failed breakout. It is that simple..
Don't be as concerned about if you get accumulation or distribution correct. Identify when the market is in a trading range or trend and watch how it acts between the interface between the 2 phases...