Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Does anyone have the skills to make a leaner chart trader in SC? It's way too fat, I mean't put that on my "bad" list. Thanks for you thoughtful consideration of the matter.
Depth and bid/ask are two different things. Bid/ask data is usually just the level1 best bid/ask. Depth is calculated from the level2, which is typically not stored, so it is live only.
Then use NT! When I first started using it, I thought the same thing, not any more. Its not as pretty, but is faster/better than NT once you get used to it.
thanks for the help, i seriously spent an hour trying to get the horizontal grid up last night. as for the chart update speed, it was at 900 ms, and was a little slower than tradestation....just changed it to 50ms so it should blow TS away...thanks again for the help
Can someone explain to me the business relationship between TransAct and Sierra Chart? There seems to be something there more than just "we're compatible". Or maybe I am just wrong. Just curious...
Transact provides SC package 3 to its client and support supposes to come from Transact not SC for that version. If you want package 5 then you have to go to SC directly.