Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
The point I was trying to make is that the users who complained and were "forced" to populate those fields might want to revert to a status where those aren't populated.
You might try adding something that allows for variations on the other themes, or combinations, or just something different, such as "Various" or "Flexible" -- it's often a good idea to have an additional category after a list to capture anything else... even it it's just "Other".
I mentioned this earlier, and had in mind as a concrete example:
It's not just a conglomeration of different things. They all fit together. As I recall it, the shorter-term stuff feeds capital to the longer-term, with the aim being to keep long-term capital growing. (I may have gotten that wrong, but you can see the point.) Any one of the existing categories would be definitely wrong by itself, and all would apply in some way and some time. Not unlike what would be true with many people, I imagine.
Bob.
When one door closes, another opens.
-- Cervantes, Don Quixote
In conjunction with xplorer we deleted my previously uploaded 'BollingerPro' indicator as shared.. It was brought
to my attention (and then explained - repeatedly) that I had somehow shared a 'non source code' version of what
I had coded.. I maintain that I hadn't checked the 'compiled' box but that doesn't matter now.. blah blah..
I was able to repopulate the description with the original wording and upload a new copy 'BollingerProChof' that
is NOT and does not contain .dll's.. I'm very much hoping this works for everyone to be able to access the code
as they'll have to on rollover.. (This was my original intention)
I'll try to share the link to the newly shared 'BollingerProChof' uploaded today in the discussion forum space..
I'm hoping this will satisfy the protocols and serve as proper notification to those that had already downloaded
what I had uploaded last fall..
Please let me know if there's something I've missed or should do to make this a seamless 'redo' ..