Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Ya..sorry about that, it was a typo. I manually enter the settlement prices into my spreadsheet at the end of the night based on the statement that's emailed to me and mis-typed the 1500.
/rsm005/
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
I have been thinking about the fact that the original strategy using naked shorts with IMx3 only had 1 losing trade (49/50 positive) over a 4-year period. The premise of this strategy seemed to be that because of the margin buffer and FOTM approach, we would be able to ride out any "paper losses" once the market rebounded and/or volatility diminished. How about if one used a slightly higher IM of 4-5X to the original strategy and just added a simple stop-loss of say 20% of the account balance? The idea being that the average winning month would bring in approximately 4-5% gains and the rare losing month would give up the 4 previous months of gains (4x5=20). For many years the stop loss would probably not ever be hit, but even if 1 or 2 of these large stops happened in any one year, the total strategy would still be break-even or slightly profitable for that year. Is this viable or do 20% account drawdowns happen multiple times a year with the naked put selling strategy?
I had done similar analysis of Ron's 2 longs+one short strategy ywhich you can see in my post few months ago. I found out the following:
% Drawdown No of trades
8%- 4
10%- 8
12%- 3
13%- 1
15%- 5
17%- 1
25%- 1
40 %- 1 -> This could have exited with profit at 55% of initial premium earlier. All other above-listed
drawdowns hit 50% premium later
They are not mutually exclusive eg one with 40% drawdown also has some of the other lower drawdowns.
From the above, I can conclude that it is safe to have drawdown limit of 25% as you would have hit it only twice for exiting at 50% premium. For 55% premium, you would hit it only once.
But Ron commented that there could be more stops. So PnL will not be attractive.
Dilip
I enjoyed reading this thread, one of the best out there. I would like to know what other advantages the ES options futures has over SPX. SPX options also has the 1256 taxing.
"Tax Treatment under section 1256 of the Tax Code, profit and loss on transactions in certain exchange-traded options, including SPX and SPXpm, are entitled to be taxed at a rate equal to 60% long-term and 40% short-term capital gain or loss, provided that the investor involved and the strategy employed satisfy the criteria of the Tax Code*"
good work, have u done a comparison using SPX options?
Also, shouldn't stop be 2x profit collected and not 1/2? e.g. if you collected $100 in premium, stop is if spread goes to $200? Would you mind clarifying your stop reasoning again?
Thanks for the response! I understand that your results are using the newer 2 Long + 1 Short strategy, but I was referring to Ron's original strategy of selling naked ES options with a low delta but using a slightly higher IM of x4 or x5 and adding a stop loss based on overall account value of 20%. Even using your dataset above, the 20% drawdown seems to have only been hit on 2 occasions if I'm reading it correctly. How long of a time period was this study for ??? It would seem the naked options would have larger drawdowns overall than the spread, but I'm not sure if these type of larger drawdowns (>20%) are also more frequent? Off the top of my head I can think of Aug 2015 and threatened Govt shutdown in 2013 as the events where big increases in volatility happened...
Quick question to everyone here. Does anyone know of a thread that deals with selling cash secured puts? I wanted to get some advice on a particular trade?
My analysis is based on Ron's 35 trades of 1x5 delta short+ 2x 1.5 delta longs strategy of post #5154. Ron feels that we have only 2 trades of 20% drawdown because market was uptrending. In downdrending market, we may have more trades and account may blow. I agree with him.
Hence, he started researching on another strategy.
Using 3x my research of 1/1/2013 to current shows 3 times a drawdown >20%. Oct 2014, Aug 2015 & Jan 2016.
If you use 4x the only time it was >20% was 8/24/15. 62.4%. The Friday before it was 9.3%. So you would have had to exit Sunday night if you could at 20%. I don't know. Anybody have intraday pricing for Sunday night 8/23/15?
The problem with a stop loss is shown by what happened on May 6, 2010 flash crash. Your stop loss would have been hit but then the market rebounded and you didn't need to exit.
I do like the idea of buying an extra put if things look like they might crash. A long put bought on 8/20/15 or 8/21/15 would have prevented all losses on 8/24/15. But that doesn't cover the unexpected crash so that is why I went with 2 longs.