Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
@verge: A failed strut in the liquid oxygen tank caused the SpaceX rocket explosion theverge.com/2015/7/20/9004463/space-x-falcon-9-rocket-explosion-cause-explained?utm_campaign=theverge&utm_content=article&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter# pic.twitter.com/kvyKGclPNo
I don't understand how SpaceX can expect to survive the deaths that it will take to get humans to mars.
Apollo cost a few people's lives in accidents. Mars is another order of magnitude compared to the moon and you don't have the will of the people involved in a cold war to sacrifice for this.
It is such an obvious "billionaire takes too much acid at Burning Man" idea.
Only skimmed the article, but did they give a reason for the change of venue? I assume water based would mean less damage, so maybe they are confident enough the next test will be successful?
