Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
In 2011, Larry Williams discussed his methodology for several markets. WD Gann, Delta Society...offered intelligent and thoughtful truths. The Egyptians also used similar models for farming, travel, fishing.
The great Law is the Law... interacting forces both near and historic converging and de-merging.
It's not something we actually take to heart...yet in fact, astronomers did, if they had truly studied.
Not everyone will work sufficiently to test, retest, and mature the skill, yet history is filled with Wise Souls who were very disciplined, honorable, and accurate...few and far between. Yet it does not invalidate the presence of the reality that is true.
It's easy to criticize what you don't understand clearly. Chalk it up to lunacy...and you limited your ability and the universe around you.
Why do some think so small when the galaxy you exist in = 100 million light years in width and 100 + million galaxies moving thru the universe... existing billions of light years in distances apart, perfectly balanced without your ability to make them so perfect?
Yet the universe tells you about eternity...and how things function.
Where do you think math came from? Souls studied the stars and creation. If man remained close minded, we would not have any flight, communications, fuels, or vehicles, medicines...as we do today. All we actual learn thereby, already exists. Yet our eyes are to discover what is.
Williams used cycles of 10 years...and averaging them monthly, weekly, daily...data mined historicals.
20, 40, 50-year cycles. Its a lot of work and with some merit, just not extremely accurate perfection.
WD Gann was more accurate than Williams because of his math and study of numerology and astronomy.
T.Bukowski explains Williams technique in general and provides a forecast model of DJIA.
So don't give up on learning and keep an open mind. You just might discover an edge you formerly ignored thru personal dis-acceptance of things you were not ready for at the time.
"It is the glory of God to conceal a matter. And the honor of a king is to search it out."
We are grateful to the true spiritual and mental pioneers.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
This is a fun read but Williams debunked Gann and there is no actual documented evidence of Ganns consistent success. Anyway, the bottom line is just looking at the Presidential and decennial patterns will be enough for most. You naturally have to put all these things in context. So a turn date means nothing unless you get some fundamental or technical reason ( preferably both) to get long or to be short. Even Williams will agree with this. For example, the folks at the Stock traders almanac are looking for a technical reason to get out of stocks in the April - May time frame because it begins a seasonally weak period. So while projections are fun and all that you shouldn't trade them alone.
I NEVER met or heard of anyone who actually trades from astrology and makes money although I see many newsletters over the years that have been trying to call a top based on some astro cylce. So if you or someone you know can do it then please start a thread with your journal showing these great ideas in action . I have a feeling no thread will come. I'm not looking for an argument here so please don't make this into some gann- astro thread. Just start a new one. Thanks
Not "honestly": the regulators said he was dishonest, and they cared enough to say that on multiple occasions they'd found clear evidence of "deceptive and unbalanced promotional material and disclosure statements" (their words).
anyone know how he did in 2018 ? I wonder if his service is on an upswing or going through another drawdown...just curious about the stock forecast only