NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Polarized Fractal Efficiency Indicator


Discussion in Commodities

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one Fat Tails with 15 posts (47 thanks)
    2. looks_two zentrade with 7 posts (2 thanks)
    3. looks_3 Cheech with 5 posts (2 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Marvin S with 3 posts (0 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Fat Tails with 3.1 thanks per post
    2. looks_two Lornz with 1 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Antisyzygy with 1 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 zentrade with 0.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 32,812 views
    2. thumb_up 59 thanks given
    3. group 24 followers
    1. forum 47 posts
    2. attach_file 16 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Polarized Fractal Efficiency Indicator

(login for full post details)
  #1 (permalink)
 
zentrade's Avatar
 zentrade 
Wilson, NC
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: thinkorswim
Trading: NQ
Posts: 18 since Dec 2010
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Received: 5

Does anyone use this indicator in the futures market? It seems to give clear signals. Most sites claim it's mainly used to trade FX.

Started this thread Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Request for MACD with option to use different MAs for fa …
NinjaTrader
Trader Dale [email protected] or Scammer Dale
Trading Reviews and Vendors
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
The space time continuum and the dynamics of a financial …
Emini and Emicro Index
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Tao te Trade: way of the WLD
30 thanks
GFIs1 1 DAX trade per day journal
27 thanks
Supertradersams Thread Journal on NQ/MNQ
26 thanks
Deaddogs Stock Trading
23 thanks
Daytrading ES & NQ
12 thanks

(login for full post details)
  #3 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Posts: 50,234 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,106
Thanks Received: 101,351



zentrade View Post
Does anyone use this indicator in the futures market? It seems to give clear signals. Most sites claim it's mainly used to trade FX.



You should post or attach the code so others know what your talking about.

Mike

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor


For the best trading education, watch our webinars
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list


Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Receive exclusive offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
(login for full post details)
  #4 (permalink)
 
zentrade's Avatar
 zentrade 
Wilson, NC
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: thinkorswim
Trading: NQ
Posts: 18 since Dec 2010
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Received: 5

Here's the thinkscript code......


declare lower;
input length = 10;
input smoothingLength = 5;
def diff = close - close[length - 1];
def val = 100 * Sqrt(Sqr(diff) + Sqr(length)) / sum(Sqrt(1 + Sqr(close - close[1])), length - 1);
plot PFE = ExpAverage(if diff > 0 then val else -val, smoothingLength);
plot UpperLevel = 50;
plot ZeroLine = 0;
plot LowerLevel = -50;
PFE.SetDefaultColor(GetColor(8));
UpperLevel.SetDefaultColor(GetColor(5));
ZeroLine.SetDefaultColor(GetColor(5));
LowerLevel.SetDefaultColor(GetColor(5));

Started this thread Reply With Quote
(login for full post details)
  #5 (permalink)
 
zentrade's Avatar
 zentrade 
Wilson, NC
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: thinkorswim
Trading: NQ
Posts: 18 since Dec 2010
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Received: 5

No one has used this indicator? I would post a few site with a description and basic trading rules but my level of posts won't allow me to.

I'm thinking of devising a strategy based mainly from this, just want to see if others are using it and how they r using it, settings etc.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
(login for full post details)
  #6 (permalink)
 
Fat Tails's Avatar
 Fat Tails 
Berlin, Europe
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, MultiCharts
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Keyboard
Posts: 9,888 since Mar 2010
Thanks Given: 4,242
Thanks Received: 27,099

If you look at the formula of the Polarized Fractal Efficiency, you will notice that it is flawed.

This is an example that shows, how easily a false concept can make it into a journal such as Technical Analysis of Stocks and Commodities. The indicator was published in 1994, and neither the author nor the editor were aware of the nonsense that was published. Nonsense is good enough for retail traders, because they are happy, if any line is plotted on their chart, best if it is colored.

But now let us come to the problem. The author developed this formula by measuring the distance of two data points on a chart and using geometry. This caused the real problem. Let us for instance look at the numerator of the indicator, which is

SQRT[(Close[n] - Close[n-1]) *(Close[n] - Close[n-1]) - period * period]

The relative weight of the period is more important, if you use instruments which trade at low values, or if you switch to lower timeframes. The indicator will treat a 1-minute-chart of EURUSD differently than a monthly chart of YM. For the 1-min EURUSD chart the value of the numerator is exclusively determined by the period of the indicator. For the monthly chart of YM the value depends to a higher extent from the close values than from the period.

If you are only a little mathematically minded, you should realize that the concept of the indicator is flawed.

By the way, there is a whole lot of indicators which measure angles on charts, which suffer from the same fallacy. So whenever you hear the word angle in the context of technical analysis, you should be alerted.

I have then searched the internet to get my analysis confirmed by someone else, and I have been successful. William Eckhardt - one of the fathers of the Turtles - has done me that favour and identified the Polarized Fractal Efficiency as one of the black sheep that do not pass the coherency test (C-Test).


The C-Test

The following is an excerpt from an article by William Eckhardt from the blog findmin.blogspot.com:

FRACTAL EFFICIENCY
Sophisticated geometric constructions can have the same problems as simpler angular formulations. For a
recent example, Hans Hannula defines a fractal efficiency indicator for a lookback of n days:
[Equation 1]
[IMG]http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5467/539/200/1.jpg[/IMG]
SQRT((Pn-P1)*(Pn-P1)+n)/SQRT((P2-P1)*(P2-P1)+1)+SQRT((P3-P2)*(P3-P2)+1)+...+SQRT((Pn-Pn-1)*(Pn-Pn-1)+1)

where P1,...,Pn are n consecutive closes. This expression is multiplied by -1 if Pn- P1 is negative.


And whatever the angular inclination of the first leg on the original chart, there exists a
rescaling of the price axis in which this first leg climbs at more than 45 degrees. Thus, this rule is incoherent. It cannot stand up to the c-test.

Here, price and time variables are combined in such a way as to make it impossible for the indicator to retain the relative importance of price action and time change when both axes are rescaled independent of each other. The trader who prices a market in dollars finds that time components mean much more to that market's fractal efficiency than the trader who prices the same market in cents. This dimensional difference is not insignificant. Consider the following three-day price series: [IMG]http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5467/539/200/b.jpg[/IMG]


Day

Seies 1 2 3
1 50.00 50.60 50.80
2 52.00 52.50 52.40

The first has a fractal efficiency of 1.420..., while the second has a slightly higher one of 1.425.... Now
suppose we multiply all these prices by 100, signaling a unit change from dollars to cents. In these units, the first series (5000, 5060, 5080) has a fractal efficiency of 1.000..., but the second (5200, 5250, 5240) has a lower fractal efficiency of 0.667.... Thus, fractal efficiency ranks these price series in an irrational and incoherent manner.
The only way to rid equation 1 of this ranking incoherency is to eliminate the time terms. The modified
formula reduces to:
[2]
[IMG]http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5467/539/200/2.jpg[/IMG]




Pn-Pn-1/ABS(P2-P1)+ABS(P3-P2)+...+ABS(Pn-Pn-1)
Simplified and divested of the surrounding incoherencies, the true formula becomes apparent. It is the net
change divided by a close-to-close path length.


For more details follow the link below:

Fin Articles: William Eckhardt: The C-Test



One More for The Garbage Heap of the History of Technical Analysis

So despite its fancy name, the polarized fractal efficiency is another indicator for the garbage heap of the history of technical analysis. It seems that it has just been created to further contribute to the confusion of retail traders.

Reply With Quote
(login for full post details)
  #7 (permalink)
 
zentrade's Avatar
 zentrade 
Wilson, NC
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: thinkorswim
Trading: NQ
Posts: 18 since Dec 2010
Thanks Given: 1
Thanks Received: 5

Thanks Fat Tails for the response. I'd be lying if I said I completely followed your logic. I'm sure it's sound, but the real question is, how does it perform in realtime. Does it completely miss the trend and give seemingly random signals? Does it have reasonable accuracy and allow you to get most of the trend. Does it signal too soon and will get you stopped out before price moves it your direction?

I appreciate your thorough analysis of it, but could you offer an explanation of it's performance that supports the theory?

Thanks again

Started this thread Reply With Quote
(login for full post details)
  #8 (permalink)
 
Fat Tails's Avatar
 Fat Tails 
Berlin, Europe
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, MultiCharts
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Keyboard
Posts: 9,888 since Mar 2010
Thanks Given: 4,242
Thanks Received: 27,099


zentrade View Post
Thanks Fat Tails for the response. I'd be lying if I said I completely followed your logic. I'm sure it's sound, but the real question is, how does it perform in realtime. Does it completely miss the trend and give seemingly random signals? Does it have reasonable accuracy and allow you to get most of the trend. Does it signal too soon and will get you stopped out before price moves it your direction?

I appreciate your thorough analysis of it, but could you offer an explanation of it's performance that supports the theory.

Thanks again


The Indicator Belongs to the Trash Can

The design of the indicator is inconsistent. It will give different signals for every instrument and for every timeframe.

If you take a standard indicator, such as the RSI, you will know that above 70 means overbought and 30 means oversold. This indicator here will not use 70/30 for all instruments, but 92/16 for EURUSD 1 min, 84/22 for EURUSD 5 min, 54/44 for ES 1 hour and so on.

The design of the indicator is flawed, so whatever you conclude it will only be vaild for a specific instrument and a specific time frame at a specific given time iin history.

To be clear: This indicator is just rubbish, and your question cannot be answered. I have only cited William Eckardt, because I feared that you would not believe in my analysis and let this indicator go where it belongs: to the trash can.

Reply With Quote
The following 3 users say Thank You to Fat Tails for this post:
(login for full post details)
  #9 (permalink)
 
Silvester17's Avatar
 Silvester17 
Columbus, OH
Market Wizard
 
Experience: None
Platform: NT 8, TOS
Trading: ES
Posts: 3,603 since Aug 2009
Thanks Given: 5,139
Thanks Received: 11,527


Fat Tails View Post
The Indicator Belongs to the Trash Can


unfortunately this would be a difficult thing to do. it's a standard indicator from TOS.

and just for fun, here's the description from TOS:



PolarizedFractalEfficiency ? Resource Center

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	2011-07-10_0937.png
Views:	676
Size:	95.8 KB
ID:	42974  
Reply With Quote
(login for full post details)
  #10 (permalink)
 
Fat Tails's Avatar
 Fat Tails 
Berlin, Europe
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, MultiCharts
Broker: Interactive Brokers
Trading: Keyboard
Posts: 9,888 since Mar 2010
Thanks Given: 4,242
Thanks Received: 27,099



Silvester17 View Post
unfortunately this would be a difficult thing to do. it's a standard indicator from TOS.

and just for fun, here's the description from TOS:

PolarizedFractalEfficiency ? Resource Center


It is also a standard NinjaTrader indicator. But this does not tell us that the indicator is correctly designed.

The commmunity of traders is made up self-taught gurus who make up for an inexhaustible supply of nonsense. All the software packages for sale are then pepped up with that nonsense, because that is what the customer wants. It is a bit similar to synthetic CDOs. They had to be created because there was such a huge demand for the repackaged subprime debt, as investors only were aware of the label awarded by the rating agencies. The only reason that the Polarized Fractal Efficiency is still around is its fancy label, which suggests a scientific background. Those who have no understanding of mathematics are easily impressed.

Let me show you an example. The two charts below show the Polarized Fractal Efficiency with default settings (14,10) on two charts, a 60 min chart of YM 09-11 and a 3-min chart of 6E.

Please have a look at those charts! Would you believe me, if I told you that both charts use the same indicator with the same settings? But that is the truth.

Consider the PFE as being like a chameleon. It becomes a different indicator for each instrument and timeframe.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	PFE Chart1.jpg
Views:	589
Size:	75.3 KB
ID:	42982   Click image for larger version

Name:	PFE Chart 2.jpg
Views:	544
Size:	99.9 KB
ID:	42983  
Reply With Quote
The following 6 users say Thank You to Fat Tails for this post:





Last Updated on April 2, 2018


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts