With using current provided strategy,
For example, Parabolic SAR LE, SE
This is easy to Optimization to find 0.04, 0.2, 0.036, 0.2 etc.

Well, it works when a big trend there, but it lose a lot when non-trend timing.
Even cannot cover the winner money on big trend.

cowbearcar 

With using current provided strategy, For example, Parabolic SAR LE, SE This is easy to Optimization to find 0.04, 0.2, 0.036, 0.2 etc. Well, it works when a big trend there, but it lose a lot when non-trend timing. Even cannot cover the winner money on big trend.

If you had that answer we could all retire...literally.

You may find a noise filter, but it would lag.

Good luck....

xiaosi 

If you had that answer we could all retire...literally. You may find a noise filter, but it would lag. Good luck....

Well, really want retire but fail on backtest

I found Schaff Trend Cycle in this web

Schaff Found the Schaff Trend Cycle in EasyLanguage, as released by Mr. Schaff himself. It's a very fast reacting indicator, which might be valuable in a MTF system. From the documentation: "What is the STC? Schaff Trend Cycle (STC) is a popular indicator …

For visual way to do:
Trend:
ADX face upwards even less than 25
RSI and DI+ face same way, or any other Substitutes, macd, ema etc etc.
outside BB 17, 1 , you can see my other post

How to compare 2 different type of indicators? Hi all I got many ideas from 2 different indicators together in the same subcharts For example, William 26 vs macd standard setting Looking for William 26 cross over macd Signal line This kicks most ZigZag Swing High/Low in eye vision. Or …

Subway:
ADX face downwards, but still trade a lot on subway if checking ADX[2] > ADX[1] and ADX[1] < ADX etc.
RSI and DI+ face different way
within BB 17, 1


Besides, I get huge numbers indicators on MT4, iTrend, zwinner, Stochastic RSI, Snaker on bolder, VQI etc.

Really exhausted at this moment.