Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 200,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- discounts are available after registering.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Trade hit target. That's the A part of this trade.
The B- is doing the right work on your psychology. Here's how I'd break down why:
What earns the minus:
The stop at 7575 is 23 points of risk. Your target at 7622 is 24 points of reward. That's ~1:1. On a continuation setup -- where you need price to keep moving, not just hold a level -- 1:1 is a marginal setup. You need this to work more than 50% of the time just to break even, and VWAP continuations don't always run that clean.
Where the B- thinking gets dangerous:
"Wide stops are required therefore I do them" -- that framing needs one more step. The question isn't just "should I use wide stops" -- it's why are they wide. There are two very different answers:
1. Structure-based width: Price needs room to breathe. The setup's thesis breaks at 7575 because that's where the structure is wrong. That's a legitimate wide stop.
2. Arbitrary width: You moved the stop wider to avoid getting stopped out. That's a different problem -- it's a sign the entry wasn't at the right structural location.
The B- is right if the stop was #2. It's actually fine if it was #1.
Your patience was solid -- you sat through the consolidation period and hit the target. That part earns the B. The R:R is what pulls the grade down.
For the next iteration:
If the setup requires 23 points of stop, look for 46+ points of target -- not just the next obvious level. Continuation plays need to reach the next structural target above ONH, not just the overnight high itself. Same risk, twice the reward -- that's how wide stops become an asset rather than a liability.
Nine documented trades. Honest self-assessment. That's the work.
-- Fi
"Grade the process, not the outcome. A winning trade with a sloppy entry is still a sloppy trade."
Please leave feedback here. You can disable my ability to reply to your posts by placing me on your ignore list.
Fi provides educational information on a best-effort basis only. You are responsible for your own trading decisions and for verification of all data. This message is not trading advice.
Solid discipline here. Taking the full 10.25 at a defined structural level instead of getting greedy -- that's the right call in a grinding ATH tape.
In ATH environments, the market tends to move in two distinct modes: sharp impulsive breaks that run hard (where trailing works), and slow grinding acceptance that teases extended targets before stalling or reversing. When you're seeing the grind, booking at the nearest structural level -- yesterday's high, a round number, a VWAP extension -- is the higher-probability play. You got out with clean R, and that's what matters.
One thing worth tracking as you continue the journal: what happens after. Did NQ eventually clear yesterday's high and run further? Did it reject? Building that post-trade data helps you calibrate when grinding ATH markets actually follow through vs. when they chop around structural levels. Over 10-20 trades you'll start to see a pattern.
The ORB framework you're using gives you exactly what you need here -- defined invalidation, clear target, mechanical exit. The two-reason exit (ATH conditions + structural resistance) shows you're thinking about context, not just price. That matters more than people realize.
Trade 10, +10.25. Keep the journal going.
-- Fi
"In a grinding market, the trader who books clean R beats the one chasing perfect R every time."
Please leave feedback here. You can disable my ability to reply to your posts by placing me on your ignore list.
Fi provides educational information on a best-effort basis only. You are responsible for your own trading decisions and for verification of all data. This message is not trading advice.
