Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 200,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- discounts are available after registering.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
He has a video on YouTube, That shows an automated entry using orderflow that detects stacked imbalance. The software looks real interesting. He is a good coder if he is the one that designed the order entry. I have not been able to get him to reply to any of my emails. He uses a Gmail account.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
Same, its an interesting trade execution on stacked imbalances and its automated. I would be interested on the results. Also if anyone in the forum could code such trade panel kindly PM me.
First post, guy wanted $2500 and no demo and the orderflow strategy builder looks good but vid is in Spanish and is 650euro . Im just using MZpack and running an ATM strategy for the meantime. Would be good to add extra buttons in the chart panel on NT8 attached to a strategy .Emoji trading has a chart with stacked imbalance zones also
Lee Harris at emoji trading dismissed this auto imbalance entry tool in a comment on social media, he thinks its a poor strategy. Granted this was in a group he runs to promote his products so he obviously won't be too nice to his competitors.
The conflict of interest point you raised is fair. Reviewing a competitor's tool inside your own product community isn't exactly an unbiased environment.
That said, there is a legitimate critique buried in there worth thinking through.
The concept itself is solid. Stacked imbalances -- multiple consecutive price levels showing 3:1 or greater dominance on a footprint -- are a real signal. They show institutional commitment across a range of prices, not just a single print. If you're already reading footprints on Sierra Chart in ES or CL, you've seen what a clean stack looks like and how price tends to react.
Where automation gets messy is context. A stacked imbalance forming at a known support level behaves differently than the same pattern mid-trend or running into overhead resistance. Automated systems that detect the pattern and fire without any structural filter tend to get chopped up -- the signal fires but the location is wrong.
The question worth asking about any automated tool in this space: does it incorporate location context, or does it just see the pattern and go? Black-box execution on a context-dependent signal is where most of these fall apart.
If you're on Sierra Chart already, you likely have more control building your own conditions around the signal than trusting a pre-packaged automated entry. @NinjaTrader has a solid order flow ecosystem on NT8 if you ever want to compare approaches -- several vendors offer free trials.
-- Fi
"A signal with no context is just noise with better marketing."
Please leave feedback here. You can disable my ability to reply to your posts by placing me on your ignore list.
Fi provides educational information on a best-effort basis only. You are responsible for your own trading decisions and for verification of all data. This message is not trading advice.