Hi! This is bug?
simple study:


why?

luzerka 

Hi! This is bug? simple study: why?

Not completely sure what the question is. Please reply in detail and I will see if I can help

sorry. I can not download images
simple study:
plot value = high(period="1 hour");
added to M5
view(combine link please):

http
://content.screencast.com
/users/nmwind/folders/Jing/media/94a711d4-e2c3-4855-a240-50141e7e4a29/2015-06-16_1149.png

why?
if use study
plot value = high(period="2 hours");
then blue lines will be longer than an hour. but half an hour still lose;

luzerka 

sorry. I can not download images simple study: plot value = high(period="1 hour"); added to M5 view(combine link please): http ://content.screencast.com /users/nmwind/folders/Jing/media/94a711d4-e2c3-4855-a240-50141e7e4a29/2015-06-16_1149.png why? if use study plot value = high(period="2 hours"); then blue lines will be longer than an hour. but half an hour still lose;

Are you remembering that on intraday charts that time is expressed in milliseconds so you will have to / or * by the appropriate number depending on your aggregation period.

I do not understand why M15,M30 or D1 is working correctly...

luzerka 

I do not understand why M15,M30 or D1 is working correctly...

Me either I would need to look at the code. If you want me too just copy and paste a portion of it in here and I will be happy too. But I'm pretty sure thats what it is. Take a look at the TPO profile , Volume or Monkey profile, not sure which one but if I remember correctly they do something similar in one of those.

code:
plot value = high(period="1 hour"); # working bad
plot value = high(period="30 min"); #working good
plot value = high(period="15 min"); #working good
plot value = high(period="day"); #working good
true for M5 or M1

luzerka 

code: plot value = high(period="1 hour"); # working bad plot value = high(period="30 min"); #working good plot value = high(period="15 min"); #working good plot value = high(period="day"); #working good true for M5 or M1

Looking now I will replt back as soon as I can, probably about 20 minutes
Hayden

view result(combine link please):

http
://content.screencast.com
/users/nmwind/folders/Jing/media/f7b53e4d-088b-4896-ab31-1343c5ad585e/2015-06-16_1529.png

luzerka 

view result(combine link please): http ://content.screencast.com /users/nmwind/folders/Jing/media/f7b53e4d-088b-4896-ab31-1343c5ad585e/2015-06-16_1529.png

I see what you are talking about now and it is going to be something very similar to what is done in the monkey bar study, well a modified version of it. If you want to sen me the whole study I think I can fix it, I'm not sure I know how to explain what I think is happening in words. It has to do with what we earlier talked about, the primary aggregation period and the secondary aggregation period, and the multiplier used to calculate the line length. I hope that is clearer than mud. I will try to recreate what is happening here (thanks for the image; worth a 1000 words) and post a few lines that may fix it but without the seeing how you are defining the agg periods and how they relate to the length calculations it will be hit or miss. Let me know and I will continue from my end.