Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Like everyone and their mother I'm trying to develop a robotic trading system, and in the process have drifted from futures to CFD's (for a variety of reasons) but in doing so have realised range bars are so wildy varied across the CFD charts, unlike with futures. Has anyone else encountered this kind of problem and found a way to deal with it? Do you think Range barts for a robotic strategy are a wise option? Any advice appreaciated.
Thanks in adavance.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
Can you explain this a bit more? The same could be said about tick bars. For tick bars, a lot of people just experiment and end up using what works best for identifying the patterns and trends that helps them personally trade their own strategy. It's a bit more of an art than a science.
I meant in the sense that some CFD charts have optimal range bars ranging from 20 to 400 depending on the instrument, while the futures charts I was previously testing on were all within a much tighter range. It just seemed a bit odd that the differences would be so high, but I've come to realis that's just the way it is. You could call it a 'brain glitch'.