NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





CQG vs Rithmic data feed


Discussion in Sierra Chart

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one commtrd with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    2. looks_two CenFlo with 1 posts (2 thanks)
    3. looks_3 mattz with 1 posts (0 thanks)
    4. looks_4 LDog with 1 posts (3 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one SimonC with 4 thanks per post
    2. looks_two LDog with 3 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 CenFlo with 2 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 commtrd with 1 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 5,144 views
    2. thumb_up 10 thanks given
    3. group 6 followers
    1. forum 4 posts
    2. attach_file 0 attachments




 
Search this Thread

CQG vs Rithmic data feed

  #1 (permalink)
commtrd
Corpus Christi TX USA
 
Posts: 4 since Nov 2012
Thanks Given: 32
Thanks Received: 2

Opened a new account with Optimus Futures (thanks Matt!) and trying to decide on a data feed. For use with Sierra. What is the best data feed especially for use with order flow reading on the DOM?

Any help and insight most definitely appreciated...

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
Strategy stop orders partially filled
EasyLanguage Programming
Trade idea based off three indicators.
Traders Hideout
REcommedations for programming help
Sierra Chart
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
 
  #2 (permalink)
 
mattz's Avatar
 mattz   is a Vendor
 
Posts: 2,493 since Sep 2010
Thanks Given: 2,441
Thanks Received: 3,791


commtrd View Post
Opened a new account with Optimus Futures (thanks Matt!) and trying to decide on a data feed. For use with Sierra. What is the best data feed especially for use with order flow reading on the DOM?

Any help and insight most definitely appreciated...

You welcome and thank you for your business.
We can try both and you can decide what is best for your connectivity and execution.

Others can give you what has worked best for them. We are data neutral and will do whatever is best for you.

Thanks,
Matt Z
Optimus Futures

There is a substantial risk of loss in futures trading. Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Trading futures and options involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. You may lose more than your initial investment. All posts are opinions and do not claim to be facts. Please conduct your own due diligence. Use only Risk capital when trading Futures.
1 800 771 6748 local 561 367 8686 email [email protected]
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)
 
LDog's Avatar
 LDog 
Lafayette, TN/USA
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: SC,TastyWorks,ToS
Broker: TDA, OANDA,AMP/CQG/SC
Trading: Looking for it/them
Posts: 210 since Sep 2015
Thanks Given: 11,919
Thanks Received: 344


I've tried both and they both seemed very good. My main reason for going with CQG was the RT costs. With my broker, CQG is $.20 round trip and Rithmic is $.50 round trip.

I'm not profitable yet (still 'in search of' the best method and discipline) so even $.30 per contract means a lot to me.

Hopefully we'll get a real trader to give you a better opinion

HTH,

LDog

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #4 (permalink)
 
CenFlo's Avatar
 CenFlo 
Tampa FL
 
Experience: None
Platform: TOS/TradingView
Broker: TDA
Trading: Equities/Cryptos
Posts: 642 since Apr 2016
Thanks Given: 830
Thanks Received: 960

I've used both and prefer the Rithmic feed over CQG as it gives much better depth on the DOM.

You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. - Wayne Gretsky
Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #5 (permalink)
 SimonC 
Philadelphia PA/USA
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: SierraChart
Broker: Optimus Futures
Trading: NQ YM ES FDAX CL
Posts: 11 since Jan 2018
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Received: 28


commtrd View Post
Opened a new account with Optimus Futures (thanks Matt!) and trying to decide on a data feed. For use with Sierra. What is the best data feed especially for use with order flow reading on the DOM?

Any help and insight most definitely appreciated...

I use Sierra Chart's own data-feed. It works great. My logic, as a non-technical person, is as simple as saying it appears to be one less thing for me to worry about. If I a guy leases me a Rolls Royce then tells me that he's developed gas made specifically for the car he's leasing me, then I'm thinking I'll pay that guy flat-fee $35/month to know I'm leasing the car and the gas from the same guy. I suppose another vendor could say "my gas works in that car" and that might be true, but it won't be me coming on some bulletin board when there's a hiccup and two vendors blame each other. The SC data-feed is a flat fee for peace of mind/fast tick-by-tick data. More important to me, than the monthly fee for SC'a data-feed, is the per-trade cost. Some gas suppliers don't charge a monthly fee but their per trade costs aren't cheap. I use the Advanced Lower Cost Connection at CTS. It costs $0.10 per side or $0.20 per round-trip. That's a lot lower than CTS' regular $0.50 per side/$1.00 RT, and also lower than Rithmic from what I hear. The SC Advanced Lower Cost Connection at CTS is available at Optimus Futures if you're with one of their FCMs that has a relationship with CTS.

Reply With Quote




Last Updated on March 18, 2018


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts