NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Earn2Trade - Cheap Tactics - Be Careful - First Day Experience


Discussion in Trading Reviews and Vendors

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one struts12 with 8 posts (11 thanks)
    2. looks_two Earn2Trade with 3 posts (1 thanks)
    3. looks_3 matthew28 with 1 posts (1 thanks)
    4. looks_4 Big Mike with 1 posts (0 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one struts12 with 1.4 thanks per post
    2. looks_two matthew28 with 1 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Daytrader999 with 1 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 Earn2Trade with 0.3 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 3,833 views
    2. thumb_up 14 thanks given
    3. group 6 followers
    1. forum 15 posts
    2. attach_file 5 attachments




Closed Thread
 
Search this Thread

Earn2Trade - Cheap Tactics - Be Careful - First Day Experience

  #11 (permalink)
 
matthew28's Avatar
 matthew28 
United Kingdom
Elite_Member
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: Bookmap
Broker: Stage 5, Rithmic
Trading: US Equity Index Futures
Posts: 1,250 since Sep 2013
Thanks Given: 3,500
Thanks Received: 2,532

I have never used Earn2Trade but I agree with their replies.
(I have used Topstep though but wouldn't have mentioned this in an Earn2Trade thread except that they were spoken of in the above post. I tried Topstep when I wanted a funding company and haven't tried any others).

Below is a screenshot of the Topstep matrix. It is the same as the E2T one in that it has a little circle on the right, with an "i" in it for Topstep but a "?" in it for E2T which brings up the tool tip.
That's it. No helpful asterix for Topstep linking you to the relevant help page, a person actually has to read down the page themselves and look at the rules and understand a scaling plan applies for the second part of the Topstep test.



Looking at the E2T site, like the Topstep site it has links below the matrix, you just have to click on them. Or you go to the comprehensive Help section and read that. Or as E2T say, you read the email which you would have received when opening the account, similar I imagine to the ones I have received from Topstep, emphasising the importance of understanding the rules and program requirements before you start trading.

The relevant information is mentioned, highlighted, linked to repeatedly from multiple different places. Launching a misleading information complaint to claim that they are trying to hide the information, mislead you and use cheap tactics is just ridiculous. Sorry if this has "triggered" anybody.

You do not win as a trader, you just get to play again the next day. If that game doesn’t appeal to you then you should not trade. Gary Norden
Thanked by:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
Quantum physics & Trading dynamics
The Elite Circle
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
Cheap historycal L1 data for stocks
Stocks and ETFs
 
  #12 (permalink)
 struts12 
philadelphia, pa
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Ninjatrader
Trading: ES, TF
Posts: 9 since Jun 2010
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Received: 11

We all have our opinions - something that you find ridiculous, I find as cheap tactics, inflexible and arrogant.

I respect your opinion and thanks for taking the time to take screenshots of one of their competitor and to go in detail to present their side.

Regarding Topstep, their customer service I found to be really good and trader friendly. I had a payment issue with them and they fixed it with an email request (at least they seemed to know they are running a business and a trader matters). Though I find their weekly loss limit rule to be prohibitive in certain regards. That said, currently I am not running anything with them but another prop firm that offers end of the day drawdown rather than trailing drawdown - that makes a huge difference in being successful.

Anyway, now that this experience is out for the traders to read - irrespective of whether they see it in the wrong or not - it will make both the traders and earn2Trade more aware.

That in itself is a win.

Started this thread
Thanked by:
  #13 (permalink)
 struts12 
philadelphia, pa
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Ninjatrader
Trading: ES, TF
Posts: 9 since Jun 2010
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Received: 11


I think another important question that is missing in this discussion is - if the trailing drawdown can be automated, if the prop firms have the ability to use various different risk algorithm's on the accounts that are providing by Rithmic - R Trader Pro then why something very basic like # of contracts allowed has not been automated to reject by earn2Trade. All the sophisticated stuff is available but not the basic check ? Think about it.

Then I found a review on TrustPilot by a user who had a very similar experience like me - on March 23rd 2021 - about 2 months back. Exactly the same issue where the user actually says - Quote -

"Other reputable prop firms like TopStep and Leeloo, have automated the rejection of orders beyond the allowable the number of contracts. Earn2Trade will make money out of your resets, if you've fat-fingered the number of contracts you're allowed to trade. There are more honest prop firms out there than Earn2Trade. They will earn your money on repetitive resets for sure!"

I am not sure if I am allowed to post an image of someone's review so I am going to refrain from doing so but I did want to bring this to other traders notice - if everything else can be automated but not the # of allowed contracts - does that not raise a red flag about the prop firms business practices ?

I am going to take a break from this now - unless more comments come through that I feel the need to answer to.

Thanks to all the traders who engaged in this post.

Started this thread
Thanked by:
  #14 (permalink)
 
Earn2Trade's Avatar
 Earn2Trade 
 
Posts: 201 since Jul 2018
Thanks Given: 9
Thanks Received: 299


struts12 View Post
I have formally launched a misleading information complaint with Better Business Bureau.

They are usually late (in months) but I know for a fact that they do follow up and flag these kind of activities - where the business provides misleading information to lure customers. Will let them decide - at the minimum this will make earn2Trade be more flexible with other users in future or be more upfront rather than hiding behind an asterisk.

I will keep everyone posted on the progress - as and when I hear from them.

Thank you for your time.

Hello struts12,

We are very sorry to hear that this was the final decision. We will be on the lookout for correspondence from them and will show the same product page and emails to them as well.

Earn2Trade
www.earn2trade.com
Become a Professional Trader. Decisions That Can Change Your Life Forever.
Follow me on Twitter
Thanked by:
  #15 (permalink)
 struts12 
philadelphia, pa
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Ninjatrader
Trading: ES, TF
Posts: 9 since Jun 2010
Thanks Given: 2
Thanks Received: 11


struts12 View Post
I think another important question that is missing in this discussion is - if the trailing drawdown can be automated, if the prop firms have the ability to use various different risk algorithm's on the accounts that are providing by Rithmic - R Trader Pro then why something very basic like # of contracts allowed has not been automated to reject by earn2Trade. All the sophisticated stuff is available but not the basic check ? Think about it.

Then I found a review on TrustPilot by a user who had a very similar experience like me - on March 23rd 2021 - about 2 months back. Exactly the same issue where the user actually says - Quote -

"Other reputable prop firms like TopStep and Leeloo, have automated the rejection of orders beyond the allowable the number of contracts. Earn2Trade will make money out of your resets, if you've fat-fingered the number of contracts you're allowed to trade. There are more honest prop firms out there than Earn2Trade. They will earn your money on repetitive resets for sure!"

I am not sure if I am allowed to post an image of someone's review so I am going to refrain from doing so but I did want to bring this to other traders notice - if everything else can be automated but not the # of allowed contracts - does that not raise a red flag about the prop firms business practices ?

I am going to take a break from this now - unless more comments come through that I feel the need to answer to.

Thanks to all the traders who engaged in this post.

Sorry, I forgot to mention - all these prop firms - Earn2Trade, Leeloo, OneUp, UProfit, Topstep - they all use the same technology from Rithmic (the actual technology provider) for their SIM/Evaluation accounts.

As in, its a deliberate decision by earn2Trade to not enable the automatic rejection of orders beyond the allowed number of contracts in Rithmic - a predatory business practice to dwindle funds from traders.

I certainly don't endorse any prop firms - you as a trader have to find your best fit but do keep this in mind when you are evaluating which prop firm to join.

Started this thread
Thanked by:
  #16 (permalink)
 
Big Mike's Avatar
 Big Mike 
Manta, Ecuador
Site Administrator
Developer
Swing Trader
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Custom solution
Broker: IBKR
Trading: Stocks & Futures
Frequency: Every few days
Duration: Weeks
Posts: 50,470 since Jun 2009
Thanks Given: 33,250
Thanks Received: 101,674

Please use the existing thread for reviews.

Sent using the NexusFi mobile app



Join the free Markets Chat beta: one platform, all the trade rooms!

We're here to help: just ask the community or contact our Help Desk

Quick Links: Change your Username or Register as a Vendor
Searching for trading reviews? Review this list
Lifetime Elite Membership: Sign-up for only $149 USD
Exclusive money saving offers from our Site Sponsors: Browse Offers
Report problems with the site: Using the NexusFi changelog thread
Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal

Closed Thread



Last Updated on May 21, 2021


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts