NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





Trading CL but not on futures?


Discussion in Commodities

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one juveman11 with 8 posts (3 thanks)
    2. looks_two Inletcap with 3 posts (3 thanks)
    3. looks_3 lemons with 2 posts (0 thanks)
    4. looks_4 sands with 2 posts (3 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Big Mike with 2 thanks per post
    2. looks_two sands with 1.5 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 Inletcap with 1 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 juveman11 with 0.4 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 8,204 views
    2. thumb_up 25 thanks given
    3. group 12 followers
    1. forum 29 posts
    2. attach_file 1 attachments




 
Search this Thread

Trading CL but not on futures?

(login for full post details)
  #21 (permalink)
 
casey44's Avatar
 casey44 
Louisville Ky
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: NT8
Trading: micros
Posts: 245 since Jan 2010
Thanks Given: 4,018
Thanks Received: 305

fwiw, I've had limited time with QM but never a bad experience with it. Have held overnight a few times and, if my stop hit, it was without slippage generally, even in the wee hours. One more thought to further limit risk is to sell a CL option credit spread against the QM position. (There are no options on QM.) Allows a wider stop for holding, and offers the time decay component. I got the idea from tastytrade. Here's a link to that video below. (fyi, they've also done similar shows on other futures with same idea, quite a lot of futures and options on futures content on their site.) If you can afford to trade CL then no reason to use QM, least not for short in/out day trades. I've a small account, could not consider holding CL overnight but in presence of other option hedges on CL futures then a QM offers a nice half-sized way to be in the market with that buffer in place. Or, can go to two QM's instead of one CL to give the flexibility of taking one off and leaving the other. Just a long winded way of saying it can just offer you another tool in the toolbox.

https://tastytrade.com/tt/shows/closing-the-gap-futures-edition/episodes/mini-crude-reducing-cost-basis-04-08-2016

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to casey44 for this post:

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
Futures Close-Out Policy
Commodities
The space time continuum and the dynamics of a financial …
Emini and Emicro Index
Request for MACD with option to use different MAs for fa …
NinjaTrader
NT7 Indicator Script Troubleshooting - Camarilla Pivots
NinjaTrader
 
Best Threads (Most Thanked)
in the last 7 days on NexusFi
Just another trading journal: PA, Wyckoff & Trends
33 thanks
Daytrading ES & NQ
32 thanks
Battlestations: Show us your trading desks!
30 thanks
Spoo-nalysis ES e-mini futures S&P 500
28 thanks
Retail Trading As An Industry
25 thanks

(login for full post details)
  #22 (permalink)
 
Inletcap's Avatar
 Inletcap 
Murrells Inlet SC
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Trading: ES, CL, ETFs
Posts: 9,159 since Dec 2012
Thanks Given: 9,765
Thanks Received: 26,036


HoopyTrading View Post
Inletcap, interesting you mentioned the QM. I just started looking at it, and I am kinda' not liking it's movement based on it's risks. Seems to me just plain old full-sized oil would give better potential. That would take time and research to verify however. But neat that someone else has been looking at it.

@bmtrading9 uses qm for day and swing trading. I can't think of a time I've heard any complaints about bad fills or liquidity but he is not "scalping for ticks" where that would make a huge difference. I believe under these circumstances QM would be a viable alternative to CL if one wants to have the benefit of scaling in and out but cannot afford ( logically) to trade ~ $43,000 per contract notional value times several contracts. I believe the charts are identical, with obvious liquidity "issues" that could impact the ultra short term timeframe traders.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to Inletcap for this post:
(login for full post details)
  #23 (permalink)
 
chrismuc's Avatar
 chrismuc 
Cologne, Germany
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Sierra Chart
Broker: Infinity Futures, SierraChart RT Data Feed
Trading: Mini-DAX, CL, 6E
Posts: 532 since Jun 2010
Thanks Given: 273
Thanks Received: 403



Inletcap View Post
I believe the charts are identical, with obvious liquidity "issues" that could impact the ultra short term timeframe traders.

Hello Inletcap,

thank you for your thoughtful input.

Trading CL I am trying to figure out how to scale in/out with not too much associated risk. I even tried CFD with 1/10th of a CL futures contract, but CFd come with 5 or more ticks spread and up to 10 $ halfturn per contract (of course depending on the brokerage) - and I need to use unusable execution platforms.

I am holding positions between 10 minutes and one ore two hours - depending on the market stopping the position out; and aim for 20 - 40 ticks with a risk of around 10 ticks.
I looked at QM and got the same feeling HoopyTrading stated.

So I wonder what you consider "ultra short term timeframe" trading in regard to QM? Do you have any parameters?

Thank you for your consideration, Best, Chris

.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
(login for full post details)
  #24 (permalink)
 
Inletcap's Avatar
 Inletcap 
Murrells Inlet SC
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Tradestation
Trading: ES, CL, ETFs
Posts: 9,159 since Dec 2012
Thanks Given: 9,765
Thanks Received: 26,036


chrismuc View Post
Hello Inletcap,

thank you for your thoughtful input.

Trading CL I am trying to figure out how to scale in/out with not too much associated risk. I even tried CFD with 1/10th of a CL futures contract, but CFd come with 5 or more ticks spread and up to 10 $ halfturn per contract (of course depending on the brokerage) - and I need to use unusable execution platforms.

I am holding positions between 10 minutes and one ore two hours - depending on the market stopping the position out; and aim for 20 - 40 ticks with a risk of around 10 ticks.
I looked at QM and got the same feeling HoopyTrading stated.

So I wonder what you consider "ultra short term timeframe" trading in regard to QM? Do you have any parameters?

Thank you for your consideration, Best, Chris

.

Just saying that a scalper would be very concerned with that type of slippage whereas someone trading for larger swings would be impacted, but could certainly still be profitable. (i.e.- someone looking to get 5-10 t twenty times per day would get really hurt with a few ticks slippage on either side)

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to Inletcap for this post:
(login for full post details)
  #25 (permalink)
 bmtrading9 
Atlanta, GA, USA
Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: MC and Jigsaw
Trading: ES, MES
Posts: 1,833 since Mar 2013
Thanks Given: 3,001
Thanks Received: 2,159


Inletcap View Post
@bmtrading9 uses qm for day and swing trading. I can't think of a time I've heard any complaints about bad fills or liquidity but he is not "scalping for ticks" where that would make a huge difference. I believe under these circumstances QM would be a viable alternative to CL if one wants to have the benefit of scaling in and out but cannot afford ( logically) to trade ~ $43,000 per contract notional value times several contracts. I believe the charts are identical, with obvious liquidity "issues" that could impact the ultra short term timeframe traders.

QM is the best for Swing and short term trading if you don't want to see yourself (small account traders) puking and re-puking by these CL movements. It moves simultaneously with CL. Moreover you can scale-in an scale-out contracts and sometimes you can use it as a hedge to reduce overnight margin requirements too, if needed.

Follow me on Twitter Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to bmtrading9 for this post:
(login for full post details)
  #26 (permalink)
 
SMCJB's Avatar
 SMCJB 
Houston TX
Legendary Market Wizard
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: TT and Stellar
Broker: Advantage Futures
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals and Crypto.
Posts: 5,015 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,339
Thanks Received: 10,115

The three big differences between CL and QM are
  • Contract Size: CL 1000 bbls vs QM 500 bbls
  • Minimum Price Change, CL 1c/bbl vs, QM 2.5c/bbl (which means tick sizes are CL $10 vs QM $12.50)
  • Settlement, CL is physical vs QM is penultimate financial.
In terms of trade-ability the prompt two months of QM are nearly always 1 tick wide, even at night it's often 1 tic wide, worst 2 tics wide. Do not look at a QM chart and think that because there are gaps that it's illiquid or that the slippage will be high because that's not the case. Just because QM didn't trade at every tick CL does, it doesn't mean the liquidity wasn't there. Market-Makers keep these contracts in-line. As mentioned before elsewhere on these forums trading QM but using a CL chart is a very viable option.

I would advise against trading the forward months though. You will get picked off, and slippage can be high, and you may or may not be able to get out quickly when you need to.

Reply With Quote
The following 2 users say Thank You to SMCJB for this post:
(login for full post details)
  #27 (permalink)
 
juveman11's Avatar
 juveman11 
Montreal, QC, Canada
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: MultiCharts
Trading: Crude CL
Posts: 17 since Jun 2016
Thanks Given: 6
Thanks Received: 6


sands View Post
Open a day trading margin futures account with a broker data feed, with let's say AMP futures for example. You'll typically need $500 or there abouts to commit to your education and you are away to start trading to a sim platform (you'll need to review the providers software options as these will vary).

Start seriously with a futures acc and a decent liquid market and you'll have the best chance to progress.

Hi Sands, I actually decided to to this. Gonna keep trading oil on CFD but have a demo futures account with a data feed. Unfortunately AMP were being discriminatory with me due to my nationality despite being a Canadian resident. But it was probably a blessing in disguise as I was about to open a 3k account without the proper trading plan ready.

Only reason I wanted AMP was for the TT platform but I'm gonna go with NinjaTrader now.

Started this thread Reply With Quote
The following user says Thank You to juveman11 for this post:
(login for full post details)
  #28 (permalink)
 
sands's Avatar
 sands 
London + UK
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: Proprietary Analytics
Broker: Multiple broker + Multiple feed
Trading: Currently European and US equities
Posts: 443 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 257
Thanks Received: 233

Unfortunately it's not uncommon for people to find certain brokers aren a good fit for them and others are a much better fit. Personally I've tried many and only ever had a problem with one (which wasn't AMP), others have been much more competent and professional thankfully. Consequently I've grown into the view that you've got to go through certain negative experiences to see where you're business is valued and who you personally can trust and where there is mutual respect because surely that's vital. Thus I'd say if it didn't work out for you just persevere and try another and I'm sure your experiences will improve.

Good luck


I'd just add that xtrader is a v good tool but likely not necessary at the beginning of your trading career, you'll likely find any other decent software will do the job you need (to help you learn) and save you some cost. Eg ninjatrader/Sierra/etc are great to start off with whether on live or demo.

Reply With Quote
(login for full post details)
  #29 (permalink)
 
juveman11's Avatar
 juveman11 
Montreal, QC, Canada
 
Experience: Beginner
Platform: MultiCharts
Trading: Crude CL
Posts: 17 since Jun 2016
Thanks Given: 6
Thanks Received: 6

Thank you Sands, one last noobi question. The main reason I want a futures platform is so I can learn market profile. Will this be an issue on demo since it's not same volume?

Started this thread Reply With Quote
(login for full post details)
  #30 (permalink)
Maria Julia
Beverly Hills, CA
 
Posts: 9 since May 2017
Thanks Given: 0
Thanks Received: 7


You can watch the daily volume and bid/ask spreads to see liquidity. Cannon Trading offers lower day margins, but the overnight is set by the exchange.

Reply With Quote





Last Updated on May 26, 2017


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts