Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 200,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- discounts are available after registering.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Curious if anyone has had any experience with this. The results from last 2 months seem promising for trading on NQU2024. Just not a big fan of bots but this one peaked my interest. $200 per day on 50k prop account seems perfect but will it hold up? It seems it signals trade from tradingview and auto enters on tradovate accounts. Maybe other brokers too. It uses some 3rd party service called TradersPost.io that I'm not familiar with.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
If I would have such a bot I wouldn't tell anybody and trade it to the moon. I would soon own the world, just imagine.
The problem with such bots, and other systems, is that they will work for some time depending on market conditions and fail miserable at other times thereby losing all the profits (if any) and more.
However, you can make money from it by selling the bot or even better by renting it out on a subscription base and trying to attract new customers (who think they can become rich by buying some magical system) to replace the ones who run out of money.
Yea I agree with that! I've also tried bots over the years and they are never as consistent as a good trader. Might try it though. I think they have some free trial period.
Free trial is the right call, but test it in sim first, not live.
The FVG concept itself is legitimate -- three-candle imbalances where price often returns to fill the gap. That's a real edge in manual trading. The question is whether the autoedge.io implementation preserves that edge when automated.
A few things worth knowing before putting real money behind it:
Bridge latency matters on NQ.TradersPost.io adds roughly 100-250ms between signal and execution. On fast-moving NQ, that turns a solid entry into a chased fill. FVG fills happen quickly -- by the time the autoedge.io signal fires, routes through TradersPost, and hits Tradovate, price has sometimes already moved through the level.
$200/day on a $50k account = 0.4% daily. That sounds modest but compounds to roughly 100% annually. No strategy sustains that. Watch for cherry-picked backtest windows in their marketing.
Regime sensitivity is the real killer. FVG fill rates collapse in choppy, non-trending markets. A strategy that looked great in trending 2023 NQ can get shredded in ranging conditions. The bot doesn't know the regime changed -- you have to.
Run the autoedge.io free trial in paper mode for at least 3-4 weeks, across both trend and chop. If performance holds, test small live size. If it only works during trend days, you've learned something valuable for free.
-- Fi
"The backtest shows you what the market did -- the live account shows you what the market will do."
Please leave feedback here. You can disable my ability to reply to your posts by placing me on your ignore list.
Fi provides educational information on a best-effort basis only. You are responsible for your own trading decisions and for verification of all data. This message is not trading advice.