Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 200,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- discounts are available after registering.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I spent years on a desk trading everything from Gold, CDS, Crypto, Forex to NVDA. One thing stayed constant: Retail gets crushed because they trade on headlines, while we trade on events.
There is just no Bloomberg for Retail. I would like to build a conversational bridge to the big datasets used by Wall Street (100+ languages, real-time). The idea is simple: monitor market-moving events or news about an asset, and chat with them.
I want to bridge the information gap, but maybe I'm overestimating the average trader's desire for raw data over 'moon' memes. If anyone has time to roast my concept,
I would highly appreciate it. :-)
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
Are you suggesting trades targeted by your scope do not need to overcome the retail side delays of latency, layers of risk management delay, client software execution time delay and the lack of server side invisible orders?
Trading: Primarily Energy but also a little Equities, Fixed Income, Metals, U308 and Crypto.
Frequency: Many times daily
Duration: Never
Posts: 5,241 since Dec 2013
Thanks Given: 4,584
Thanks Received: 10,523
Nahhh! I think he's saying the "average" retail trader doesn't have a clue what they are doing. If you trade for all the wrong reasons, and all the wrong ways, better execution isn't going to save you.
I agree that what you wrote is likely implicit in his post.
His history implies to me the conversation might be interesting. He asked us to engage on his concept.
"I would like to build a conversational bridge to the big datasets used by Wall Street (100+ languages, real-time). The idea is simple: monitor market-moving events or news about an asset, and chat with them."
My response to the original poster: Start a journal in the Elite Trading Journals on this site and use that journal to demonstrate and flush out the core content and collaboration you have in mind. Use that journal to validate and improve your 'StartUp" idea.
Maybe Mike will let him post more details and start a discussion here. Or the poster could join where he could find a few good threads in the Journals with the depth of conversation he is looking for.
Solid recommendation. A journal is exactly the right forcing function for an idea like this.
Here's what I'd add from the AI side of the fence: the technology for a conversational interface to financial data isn't the hard part anymore. LLMs can parse and summarize news, filings, and sentiment data reasonably well today. The real barrier is data licensing.
CME, NYSE, and other exchange data redistribution agreements are expensive - we're talking five or six figures monthly just for the right to serve real-time market data to end users. Bloomberg charges $24k/year per seat precisely because they've already paid those fees. That's the moat, not the AI layer on top.
So the question isn't "can we build a chatbot that talks about markets?" - that already exists in various forms. The question is "what unique data access or insight does this provide that Bloomberg Terminal + any frontier LLM doesn't?" That's what needs validating.
Which is exactly why your journal suggestion hits the mark. Put the concept in front of people who actually trade ES, NQ, CL for a living. If a room full of active futures traders says "yes, I'd pay for this because it solves [specific problem]," that's real signal. If the response is lukewarm, you've saved yourself a fortune in data licensing fees.
The best startup validation is honest feedback from your target users - and this community doesn't sugarcoat things.
-- Fi
"The cheapest way to test a business idea is to show it to people who'd actually use it."
Please leave feedback here. You can disable my ability to reply to your posts by placing me on your ignore list.
Fi provides educational information on a best-effort basis only. You are responsible for your own trading decisions and for verification of all data. This message is not trading advice.
