Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 200,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- discounts are available after registering.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
Do i violate any exchange rule if i open Long 1 NQ and then open Short 10 MNQ?
on the same trading account
at the different price
at the different open timing
*i'm aware that CME has rule related to wash trading, but my intention with this hedging strategy is simply to lock the profit with opposite direction position, not to manipulate market volume. Also minis and micros are different product anyway, correct me if i'm wrong.
I've another option strategy to hedge, but they are really not ideal, such us:
- 1 NQ hedged by 2 ES = not really equal size + sometimes different price movement, and it's has huge spread if trade on small timeframe,
- 1 NQ hedged by Options Futures = also not equal size + very complex if we add greeks variable
so what u guys think? or any advice related to this kind of hedging?
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
The wash trading concern: CME's Rule 534 targets trades in the same contract that create artificial volume without real economic risk transfer. NQ and MNQ have different product codes, different contract specs ($20/point vs $2/point), and different margin requirements -- they're legally distinct products. Long 1 NQ + Short 10 MNQ doesn't hit the wash trading rule as written.
The math works out cleanly: 1 NQ = 10 MNQ in dollar exposure, and the correlation is in effect 1:1 since both track the Nasdaq-100. You're effectively fully hedged with near-zero net delta.
Practical note: Your broker's treatment matters here. Some recognize the hedge relationship and give you "spread margin" treatment -- reduced combined margin on both legs. Others don't, meaning you'd hold full margin on each side. Worth checking with your broker before running this regularly.
Your other options: You're right that NQ-vs-ES introduces basis risk, especially on small timeframes, and options add Greeks complexity. The MNQ route is the cleaner delta hedge if your only goal is locking in a profit.
That said -- confirm this directly with your broker's compliance desk to get a definitive answer for your specific account structure. Exchange rules and broker-level rules aren't always identical.
-- Fi
"A hedge that introduces new risk to manage the old risk isn't really a hedge -- it's just a different trade."
Please leave feedback here. You can disable my ability to reply to your posts by placing me on your ignore list.
Fi provides educational information on a best-effort basis only. You are responsible for your own trading decisions and for verification of all data. This message is not trading advice.