NexusFi: Find Your Edge


Home Menu

 





MACD and Stochastic sucks???


Discussion in Traders Hideout

Updated
      Top Posters
    1. looks_one monpere with 22 posts (37 thanks)
    2. looks_two Lord Sidious with 15 posts (2 thanks)
    3. looks_3 ThatManFromTexas with 11 posts (10 thanks)
    4. looks_4 NetTecture with 10 posts (8 thanks)
      Best Posters
    1. looks_one Fat Tails with 2.6 thanks per post
    2. looks_two monpere with 1.7 thanks per post
    3. looks_3 ThatManFromTexas with 0.9 thanks per post
    4. looks_4 NetTecture with 0.8 thanks per post
    1. trending_up 52,400 views
    2. thumb_up 94 thanks given
    3. group 16 followers
    1. forum 91 posts
    2. attach_file 11 attachments




 
Search this Thread

MACD and Stochastic sucks???

  #21 (permalink)
Lord Sidious
Portugal
 
Posts: 91 since Apr 2012
Thanks Given: 8
Thanks Received: 15


NetTecture View Post
Yes, classical. After THAT move anything the stochastics fives you is total bullshit. Go some bars back it was NAILED to the top - totally overstretched. Basically I demand the stochastics to get back into reasonable area BEFORE (!) looking at it again. A drop under 80 does not mean "sell" here, it means "I am actually starting to measure something again".

THere is also this ruls of not trying to catch the extreme top of a strong trend day, and I am not sure what else than a strong trend day you would like this to be.

One filter that I very nicely use is EMA 5. Even with price action. Only enter when that has turned. You also want some non trivial price action confirmation after strong trents. Look at your short - it was pretty much still visually a strong uptrend, just a - ah - slowing one. Were you waiting for an inverse cup to form?

Basically this really was "ok, the stochastics got totally overstretched in a strong movement due to being unable to go over 100". And you were so nice to go in directly when basically there was no down movement but the push was fading out and the indicator started to show ANY value again


Which MA do you use, NetTecture?

Reply With Quote

Can you help answer these questions
from other members on NexusFi?
Better Renko Gaps
The Elite Circle
What broker to use for trading palladium futures
Commodities
MC PL editor upgrade
MultiCharts
About a successful futures trader who didnt know anythin …
Psychology and Money Management
ZombieSqueeze
Platforms and Indicators
 
  #22 (permalink)
 NetTecture 
Szczecin
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja, writing own now
Posts: 211 since Mar 2010

I pretty much only use an EMA 5 as "final direction filter". I never enter a position against that one unless it is a very specific circumstance.

FOr the rest - price action (read brooks) followed by some Fishers. I play with ADC and ATR to define a "very low volatility" filter.

Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)
 
Beljevina's Avatar
 Beljevina 
Toronto, Canada
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader, SierraCharts
Broker: Amp/CQG, IB
Trading: CL, GC, 6E, ES, RTY, EURUSD, GBPJPY, AUDUSD
Posts: 352 since Sep 2010


I don't trade YM, but here's what I see. You shorted into established MA support, as shown on your chart - not sure which MA that is, but it seems to be serving you well, showing price support. On a melt-up day like today, that's important, as is the ability to recognize the crazy rise that the big boys were casting upon the markets: before you short and step in front of a fast moving freight train, you want to see some sort of confirmation of a move down.

Looking at my chart (which is sort of my default template for new charts), one can see the stringent obeying that price did of resistance levels (especially R2 and then R3). Your chart MA is better than my lowest one (EMA 21, dashed yellow line), since the EMA 21 will not provide support to this type of fast moving market, which is rare momentum.

After that wide range 5m bar that took price to 13192, one needs to be suspect of what will come next; no move down in succesive bars is a hint at a melt-up day about to form or further continue; today was a quite fast moving one. The 10am EST news was much beyond expectations, so the big boys took advantage of it. With Europe closed and no precedent set, it makes it easier and more likely for price to explore higher. I have a peak value price indi that plots the close of the WRBs that have huge volume associated with them - you will find this at minimum is a decent price barrier. (13192 from that ~10am bar)

Uncannily great support is provided by the fibs of yesterday's PA (indi by Fat Tails) - I extended the lines to the left of the screen, showing 78.6%, yest-high (100%), 127.2% of yesterday's price range. Notice how price slices through and moves through each potential barrier with ease. Combined with the move north of R1, then R2, shorting is an iffy undertaking most of the time. Notice how after R2 and 161.8% of yesterday's price, it continues to move north. At that point, 200% becomes a natural magnet as does the next level of resistance, R3 in this case. At that point - after having sliced through 3 resistance levels and gone double yesterday's price movement, the average daily range is quite high (sorry I don't have it on here, but ES was 20.5 ADR) and potential shorts can be looked for, BUT too often, the big boys will leave the price here, and range things, as they distribute (or accumulate). If I have not ridden it up to that point, I am not in good psychological shape to look for shorts, on what usually end up being table scraps or stop-outs, and I am looking to other markets for moves that have not finished, or are not heavily correlated.

I also use some other techniques and tools, but since I don't trade YM, I won't go there.

Follow me on Twitter Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)
 
Sunil P's Avatar
 Sunil P 
los angeles
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: nt
Trading: cl
Posts: 290 since Jan 2012

My eyes! Doc can you fix them? I am seeing lines all over the place.
Dr: what do you do all day?
Me: look at futures charts.
Dr. Oh...
sounds like a personal problem.

Visit my NexusFi Trade Journal Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)
 
monpere's Avatar
 monpere 
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
Posts: 1,854 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 300
Thanks Received: 3,372


ThatManFromTexas View Post
@Lord Sidious

Noooo ... the problem is ; You are treating the MACD and Stochastics as a mechanical trade system. They both crossed and you sold. Price was still above the "Fast" Moving average and the "fast" moving average was still above the "slow" moving average.

Indicators are not an absolute command. You have to take what you see in context with what they tell you.

Don't be like these guys....

Man Drowns Following GPS Instructions Into Lake

More Stories Of People Following GPS Blindly Into Dangerous Situations | Techdirt

Sure, indicators can be absolute command, that's how I trade, that's what a strict mechanical method is all about. But, you have to verify that these signals have proven themselves historically over a large sample of trades. But however you trade, you have to realize that no method is right 100% of the time. Sometimes the most picture perfect setups fail, and the most ugly ones win for no apparent reason. That's the nature of the markets, and you have to accept that. What counts is not how 1 of these signals perform, it is how 100 instances of these signals perform.

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #26 (permalink)
 
ThatManFromTexas's Avatar
 ThatManFromTexas 
Houston,Tx
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Trading: TF
Posts: 2,265 since Feb 2010
Thanks Given: 1,206
Thanks Received: 4,355


monpere View Post
Sure, indicators can be absolute command, that's how I trade, that's what a strict mechanical method is all about. But, you have to verify that these signals have proven themselves historically over a large sample of trades. But however you trade, you have to realize that no method is right 100% of the time. Sometimes the most picture perfect setups fail, and the most ugly ones win for no apparent reason. That's the nature of the markets, and you have to accept that. What counts is not how 1 of these signals perform, it is how 100 instances of these signals perform.

@monpere

Soooooo ........ what percentage of the time would you say GPS is correct....

Man Drowns Following GPS Instructions Into Lake

More Stories Of People Following GPS Blindly Into Dangerous Situations | Techdirt


What percentage of the time is GPS correct...

I'm just a simple man trading a simple plan.

My daddy always said, "Every day above ground is a good day!"
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)
 
monpere's Avatar
 monpere 
Bala, PA, USA
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus, IB
Trading: SPY, Oil, Euro
Posts: 1,854 since Jul 2010
Thanks Given: 300
Thanks Received: 3,372


ThatManFromTexas View Post
@monpere

Soooooo ........ what percentage of the time would you say GPS is correct....

Man Drowns Following GPS Instructions Into Lake

More Stories Of People Following GPS Blindly Into Dangerous Situations | Techdirt


What percentage of the time is GPS correct...

When I was in Germany, and couldn't switch the GPS to english, it was wrong pretty much 100% of the time

Reply With Quote
Thanked by:
  #28 (permalink)
Lord Sidious
Portugal
 
Posts: 91 since Apr 2012
Thanks Given: 8
Thanks Received: 15


NetTecture View Post
I pretty much only use an EMA 5 as "final direction filter". I never enter a position against that one unless it is a very specific circumstance.

FOr the rest - price action (read brooks) followed by some Fishers. I play with ADC and ATR to define a "very low volatility" filter.

Have you been sucessful, so far?

Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)
 NetTecture 
Szczecin
 
Experience: Intermediate
Platform: Ninja, writing own now
Posts: 211 since Mar 2010

With that yes. Sadly my main problem is that I have a decent career and work was eating me alive the last 18 months I only had a little side stuff going on. My main problem is that a "I earn 500 USD per day stable" scenario for means "Ouch, serious loss of income".

But the "snort EMA as final filter" has been a decent rule for a long time. Btw., here is the short in YM now finally realizing.

Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)
 
ThatManFromTexas's Avatar
 ThatManFromTexas 
Houston,Tx
 
Experience: Advanced
Platform: NinjaTrader
Broker: Mirus Futures/Zen-Fire
Trading: TF
Posts: 2,265 since Feb 2010
Thanks Given: 1,206
Thanks Received: 4,355



NetTecture View Post
With that yes. Sadly my main problem is that I have a decent career and work was eating me alive the last 18 months I only had a little side stuff going on. My main problem is that a "I earn 500 USD per day stable" scenario for means "Ouch, serious loss of income".

.

Maybe you'll be lucky and get laid off ....


(Joking!)

I'm just a simple man trading a simple plan.

My daddy always said, "Every day above ground is a good day!"
Reply With Quote




Last Updated on January 26, 2013


© 2024 NexusFi™, s.a., All Rights Reserved.
Av Ricardo J. Alfaro, Century Tower, Panama City, Panama, Ph: +507 833-9432 (Panama and Intl), +1 888-312-3001 (USA and Canada)
All information is for educational use only and is not investment advice. There is a substantial risk of loss in trading commodity futures, stocks, options and foreign exchange products. Past performance is not indicative of future results.
About Us - Contact Us - Site Rules, Acceptable Use, and Terms and Conditions - Privacy Policy - Downloads - Top
no new posts