Welcome to NexusFi: the best trading community on the planet, with over 150,000 members Sign Up Now for Free
Genuine reviews from real traders, not fake reviews from stealth vendors
Quality education from leading professional traders
We are a friendly, helpful, and positive community
We do not tolerate rude behavior, trolling, or vendors advertising in posts
We are here to help, just let us know what you need
You'll need to register in order to view the content of the threads and start contributing to our community. It's free for basic access, or support us by becoming an Elite Member -- see if you qualify for a discount below.
-- Big Mike, Site Administrator
(If you already have an account, login at the top of the page)
I did the course in 2015 and it had less content. The sections 4.5 and 4.6 for record keeping and manual backtesting are the topics I was referring to.
Can you help answer these questions from other members on NexusFi?
Very true. If all of us had really understood and believed just how much time, work and persistence was actually required to even get close to being a successful trader, then we probably wouldn't have tried. You have to work out what is relevant to price movement and utilise those things....and quickly dispose of things that you learn are irrelevant distractions. This takes more time than you think.
Fully understanding 'expectancy', 'edge', 'probablistic thinking' are a few (non chart) concepts that are critical to understand sooner rather than later. Understanding these will help you develop a realistic mindset that will assist with your work of getting a handle on price movement and how you might be able to exploit it to your advantage.
Impressive! And congrats on reaching such a level of proficiency!
It is, however, different from M5 that Brooks promotes. Looks like, your trading style is more swinging rather than day trading. I am yet to see how his principles apply to other timeframes.
For those of us who do not have access to the restricted section, can you post a couple of your trades? They could also be the most and least productive.
I was using two-point trailing stop. Increasing SL because of possible dojis like those emphasizes even more that one has to look for larger take-profits. The stakes are getting higher.
I am rereading Brooks' book to get a deeper understanding of his ideas and putting things in order in my mind.
About VWAP, cannot help but notice that it is usually a 2nd stop once the price action breaks 20EMA. Brooks does not mention it. I am still experimenting with it. Would you recommend getting rid of it? The same goes for Volume Profile.
Clearly, everyone here has come up with their own method. As I develop mine, I am looking for something along the lines of "As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another."
You're right. Everybody has their own method and only some are profitable using it.
For me, as PA trader and based on the learnings of Brooks, I totally discard volume profile and VWAP. And in fact, all other indicators. Yes, in my years of losing money I had tried them all as many traders I know.
You can see more details in my journal, but I have a 5m chart on, EMA20 and EMA220 (hourly). They work fantastic for me on the Bund.
I have volume on their as well which I use to confirm my idea about profit taking of bulls and bears. That means, at some obvious target (a measured move or something), if I see big volume, that's probably going to be close to the end of the move.
Similarly, a breakout closing on its high or low accompanied by some heavy volume just gives me a little confidence, but I usually don't look at volume at all.
has kindly defined 'expectancy' for us. Can you, or someone else, give simple definitions to 'edge' and 'probablistic thinking' as they pertain to trading?
What Brooks uses is one set of ideas. There are others. People on FIO have used just about every conceivable thing, and, over the years, the same methods have worked for some but not for others. Probably the individual trader's use of them is more important than the method. You will get totally contradictory advice on how to trade, from well-meaning and successful traders, and if it confuses you that one says the exact opposite of another, well, that's because methods that contradict each other can still be made to work, and work well.
This may not be too helpful. Sorry. But it's true.
As to your questions:
Volume profile can get very involved. At this point you have invested some time in price action concepts. I'm not saying that you can't branch out into new ideas, but focus and experience are probably better now. You could start to look into volume and market profile concepts as something to study and eventually decide whether to add it or not. But it probably will take some learning before you are ready to apply it. You will encounter people who tell you it's the only way to go, and then others who tell you it's worthless. Refer to what I said about contradictions just above.
VWAP is a simpler thing: it's essentially the average price for the day, weighting by the size (volume) of the trades, so bigger trades have more impact on it. It can be support or resistance, and/or it can be a marker of whether price is currently exceeding or returning to its average. Interpretation of VWAP and its associated standard deviation bands can also get involved. Many people do put it to good use. Is it better than a regular moving average? Possibly . Depends on how you use it, and that may take some study also. If you wanted to think about VWAP in terms of S/R, that would be a start, and you could see if it helps or not. Just don't get too tangled up in trying too many things at once.
So the best advice remains to keep it simple. Also, stay with something you can understand and apply consistently. When you are doing the same thing, consistently, you can have enough feedback from your trading to know if it is working for you. Then you can make changes, which can include adding new things. Right now you're pretty much using what you found in a book, with some semi-random comments on this web site. You need to do more now. Then you'll have something to think about and work with.
I know you're looking for concrete advice, but the best advice is: do more trades. A lot more.
So make trades, post them, refine your execution, and gather real-world information from trading. Repeat.
Brooks rarely mentions volume. One place he mentions it is when discussing trend channel lines at key turning points. I assume he has it on his graphs, or easily accessible, and use it as confirmation rather than a sign.
For those who cannot access your journal in the forbidden section, is there another place to take a look at your examples? One or two would suffice.
KISS all the way! (people can look up this acronym
For now, I see at least two ways to make more trades. 1) Continue daily sim, 2) Do 90-day backtest. Once I figure most common pattern, I'll start on this one.